1983
DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(83)90158-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keyboard design through physiological strain measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found by all aforementioned studies, including ours. These findings seem contradictory to Zipp et al (1983). An explanation was published recently by Brown et al (2007).…”
Section: Muscle Activitymentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found by all aforementioned studies, including ours. These findings seem contradictory to Zipp et al (1983). An explanation was published recently by Brown et al (2007).…”
Section: Muscle Activitymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…According to the manufacturer of the I-pen, the more natural hand position during use of the I-pen should reduce the muscular load on the Trapezius. Zipp et al (1983) investigated the effects of lower arm pronation on Trapezius EMG. Their results showed that a pronation of the lower arm reduced by 10 already caused significantly lower muscle activity in neck, shoulder and arm muscles during keyboard work.…”
Section: Muscle Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence linking awkward wrist and forearm postures during keyboard use to elevated risk for arm disorders is mixed (Gerr et al, 2004). However, during the past 50 years, a number of alternative geometry keyboard designs have been proposed to reduce awkward wrist and forearm postures during typing (Kroemer, 1972;Zipp et al, 1983;Nakaseko et al, 1985;Honan et al, 1995). Only recently has there been evidence, from prospective intervention trials, that alternative geometry keyboard designs may reduce or prevent hand and arm pain and disorders (Tittiranonda et al, 1999;Moore and Swanson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(13,14) Electromyographic studies conducted on split keyboard users also showed reduced electrical activities of the forearm as well as the neck and shoulder muscles. (15,16) In response to these findings, alternative keyboards have been designed and marketed to improve hand and forearm postures as well as comfort during typing. Performance, electromyographic analysis, and subjective preference data, based on short-term (1-3 day) use of these keyboards have demonstrated decreased electromyographic activities of the finger flexors and extensors and wrist flexors, (17) significant reduction in wrist extension and ulnar deviation, (18,19) and favorable ratings (20,21) in comparison with a conventional keyboard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%