2021
DOI: 10.1111/jch.14214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney function and markers of renal damage after renal denervation. Does method of measurement matter? The Reshape CV‐Risk Study

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cohort presented here, no adverse effects on renal function were found as a safety aspect in patients both without and with renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.7 m 2 ). This finding is consistent with that of other reports demonstrating this over a FU period of 12 (30), 24 (31), and 36 (17) months. At the long-term FU, a decline in renal function was found in both groups, as expected, in the range of 0.9-5.8 ml/min/ 1.73 m 2 annually reported for hypertensive patients (32,33).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In the cohort presented here, no adverse effects on renal function were found as a safety aspect in patients both without and with renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.7 m 2 ). This finding is consistent with that of other reports demonstrating this over a FU period of 12 (30), 24 (31), and 36 (17) months. At the long-term FU, a decline in renal function was found in both groups, as expected, in the range of 0.9-5.8 ml/min/ 1.73 m 2 annually reported for hypertensive patients (32,33).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Even though patients without CKD had a greater decrease in eGFR during the first year after RDN, there was no significant difference in the decline of eGFR between the two groups after three years of follow-up. 56 The 3-year incidence of CV death (not non-CV) and all CV and renal events was significantly higher after RDN in patients with CKD than in those without CKD, while the incidence of renal artery reintervention due to perforation or dissection and vascular complications was low in both groups without a significant difference in frequency between the studied groups. 57 However, due to the design of the registry and the absence of a sham control group (placebo), it is not possible to assess whether RDN reduces the frequency of CV events in patients with CKD through BP-dependent and BP-independent mechanisms.…”
Section: Renal Denervation In Ckd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…62 Conversely, in non-randomized studies in which renal function (GFR) was directly measured (mGFR) and not estimated (eGFR), impairment of renal function was observed even 1-2 years after RDN. 56 Therefore, more long-term data with mGFR are needed to conclude on the renal safety of RDN in this population like currently ongoing RDN-CKD Study Which aimed to demonstrate that RDN effectively reduces 24-h ambulatory BP in 80 patients with CKD stage 3A or 3B. 63…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%