2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KiDS+VIKING-450: Cosmic shear tomography with optical and infrared data

Abstract: We present a tomographic cosmic shear analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) combined with the VISTA Kilo-Degree Infrared Galaxy Survey (VIKING). This is the first time that a full optical to near-infrared data set has been used for a wide-field cosmological weak lensing experiment. This unprecedented data, spanning 450 deg 2 , allows us to improve significantly the estimation of photometric redshifts, such that we are able to include robustly higher-redshift sources for the lensing measurement, and -most i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

21
435
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
21
435
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[73,97]; and in our model, increasing ∆N eff comes at the price of introducing DM-DR interaction effects not favoured by the data. In any case we see that the ETHOS n = 4 model offers no clear opportunities to accommodate the high value of H 0 [24] and/or the low value of σ 8 hinted by some datasets [25][26][27].…”
Section: Ethos N = 4 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[73,97]; and in our model, increasing ∆N eff comes at the price of introducing DM-DR interaction effects not favoured by the data. In any case we see that the ETHOS n = 4 model offers no clear opportunities to accommodate the high value of H 0 [24] and/or the low value of σ 8 hinted by some datasets [25][26][27].…”
Section: Ethos N = 4 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hildebrandt et al 2012;Hoyle et al 2018;Tanaka et al 2018), or (3) direct calibration using spectroscopic redshift training samples (see e.g. Lima et al 2008;Hildebrandt et al 2017Hildebrandt et al , 2020Buchs et al 2019;Wright et al 2020). More recently, however, steps have been taken towards constructing a fourth, hybrid category which leverages both cross-correlation and direct calibration (Rau et al 2019;Sánchez & Bernstein 2018;Alarcon et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy is particularly challenging given that the lensing signal obtained from the Planck angular trispectrum is consistent with the standard cosmology [1]. Furthermore, a 2σ difference in the Ω m − σ 8 plane can be inferred by comparing CMB and cosmic shear data [4] (see also [5]), where Ω m is the matter density parameter and σ 8 is the matter fluctuation amplitude on scales of 8h −1 Mpc. Currently, one of the main arguments is that such discrepancies may be an indication of new physics beyond ΛCDM, and many analyses have investigated alternative scenarios that could reconcile the data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%