2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019wr025258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kilometer‐Scale Hydrologic Exchange Flows in a Gravel Bed River Corridor and Their Implications to Solute Migration

Abstract: A well‐characterized field site along a major, gravel bed river corridor was used to investigate the dynamic pathways and impacts of subsurface hydrogeologic structure on kilometer‐scale hydrologic exchange flows between river water and groundwater. An aqueous uranium (Uaq) plume exists within a hyporheic alluvial aquifer at the site that discharges to the Columbia River. We performed temporally intensive monitoring of specific conductance (SpC) and Uaq concentrations within the plume for a 2‐year period at va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the fluvial deposition on the riverbed plays an important role in controlling the exchange flow, its thickness is highly uncertain and spatially variable (0.5 to~2 m based on field experience). Instead of directly modeling the fluvial layer, a river conductance boundary condition was used at the river-sediment interface following Hammond and Lichtner (2010) and Zachara et al (2020). The conductance coefficient was the main model parameter, which was manually adjusted to fit the water level and SpC measurements in a set of wells.…”
Section: Flow and Transport Modeling 221 Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the fluvial deposition on the riverbed plays an important role in controlling the exchange flow, its thickness is highly uncertain and spatially variable (0.5 to~2 m based on field experience). Instead of directly modeling the fluvial layer, a river conductance boundary condition was used at the river-sediment interface following Hammond and Lichtner (2010) and Zachara et al (2020). The conductance coefficient was the main model parameter, which was manually adjusted to fit the water level and SpC measurements in a set of wells.…”
Section: Flow and Transport Modeling 221 Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We manually adjusted the river conductance coefficient to better match the measured hydraulic heads and SpC in 28 long-term monitoring wells (circled dots in Figure 3a). We started with two conductance values of 1 × 10 −12 and 1 × 10 −13 m based on previous studies (Hammond & Lichtner, 2010;Zachara et al, 2020). Then the conductance values were iteratively refined twice (5 × 10 −13 and 2.5 × 10 −13 m) to improve the match between the simulated and measured groundwater level and SpC.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It serves as an input for various ecohydrological models to determine snowpack, infiltration, surface-water flow, groundwater recharge, and transport of chemicals, sediments, nutrients, and pesticides (Devi et al, 2015). Numerical modeling of surface flow typically requires a complete time series of precipitation along with other meteorological records (e.g., temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation) as inputs for simulations (Dwivedi et al, 2017(Dwivedi et al, , 2018Hubbard et al, 2018Hubbard et al, , 2020Zachara et al, 2020). However, meteorological records often have missing values for various reasons, such as due to malfunctioning of equipment, network interruptions, and natural hazards (Varadharajan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic interactions between groundwater and river water (GW-RW) plays an important role in the hydrologic and biogeochemical processes in river corridor ecosystems Ward, 1988, 1993;Boulton et al, 2010;Fleckenstein et al, 2010;Harvey and Gooseff, 2015;Ward and Packman, 2019), as well as in contaminant fate and transport within the zone of GW-RW mixing (Ford, 2004;Zachara et al, 2013Zachara et al, , 2016Zachara et al, , 2020Ma et al, 2014a;Shuai et al, 2019). Understanding the spatial and temporal dynamics of hydrologic and geochemical processes in this zone is of critical importance for contaminated site management because approximately 75% of sites regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) are located within half a mile of a surface water (Tomassoni, 1999;Biksey et al, 2001), and many of these discharge to surface waters (US-EPA, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%