2021
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abcc02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic Analysis of a Protostellar Multiple System: Measuring the Protostar Masses and Assessing Gravitational Instability in the Disks of L1448 IRS3B and L1448 IRS3A

Abstract: We present new Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations toward a compact (∼230 au separation) triple protostar system, L1448 IRS3B, at 879 μm with 011 × 005 resolution. Spiral arm structure within the circum-multiple disk is well resolved in dust continuum toward IRS3B, and we detect the known wide (∼2300 au) companion, IRS3A, also resolving possible spiral substructure. Using dense gas tracers, C17O (J = 3   2)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than being in a self-regulating state of self-gravity, as is likely the case with the Elias 2-27 system, L1448 IRS 3B has undergone disk fragmentation into three protostellar objects objects (Tobin et al 2016). Interestingly, recent observations using the molecular lines 12 CO, SiO, H 13 CO + , H 13 CN/SO 2 and C 17 O did not show any kinematic perturbations caused by the embedded companions (Reynolds et al 2021). This may be because the spatial and spectral resolution was below that required to detect kinematic features such as velocity kinks and the GI Wiggle, but it is also possible that the presence of the companions suppresses kinematic evidence of GI as in Rowther et al (2020a).…”
Section: Large Scale Spirals and Gravitational Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rather than being in a self-regulating state of self-gravity, as is likely the case with the Elias 2-27 system, L1448 IRS 3B has undergone disk fragmentation into three protostellar objects objects (Tobin et al 2016). Interestingly, recent observations using the molecular lines 12 CO, SiO, H 13 CO + , H 13 CN/SO 2 and C 17 O did not show any kinematic perturbations caused by the embedded companions (Reynolds et al 2021). This may be because the spatial and spectral resolution was below that required to detect kinematic features such as velocity kinks and the GI Wiggle, but it is also possible that the presence of the companions suppresses kinematic evidence of GI as in Rowther et al (2020a).…”
Section: Large Scale Spirals and Gravitational Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the close multiples we observe could be the result of the disks that already fragmented, and the disks may not remain in a nearunstable state for long enough time to enable many of them to be discovered. For example, we did not detect obvious analogs to the fragmenting triple system L1448 IRS3B in Perseus (Tobin et al 2016b;Reynolds et al 2021) within Orion, and spatial resolution was too low to detect analogues to [BHB2007] 11 (Alves et al 2019). We do note however that the instability calculations presented in Paper I made many simplifying assumptions to arrive at a disk-averaged limit, so those values should not be considered absolute.…”
Section: Formation Mechanisms Of Multiple Systemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These flux density ratios have no relation to the underlying mass ratios of these systems because there are clear examples where the brightest dust continuum source in a system is not the most massive (e.g., L1448 IRS3B; Tobin et al 2016b;Reynolds et al 2021). The ratios could be interpreted as a dust mass ratio of the circumstellar disks around each component of a multiple system, with the caveat that the VLA data can have contributions from free-free emission.…”
Section: Dynamic Range Of Detected Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do find some disks that appear to have been caught in the act (e.g. Tobin et al 2016bTobin et al , 2018Reynolds et al 2021). So it may simply be the case that these disks remain in this state for short periods of time and are therefore difficult to directly observe, or have already formed multiple systems that would have been excluded from our modeling.…”
Section: Gravitational Stability Of Protostellar Disksmentioning
confidence: 83%