ASME 2008 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Parts a and B 2008
DOI: 10.1115/dscc2008-2253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic Control of Nonholonomic Wheeled Mobile Manipulator: A Differential Flatness Approach

Abstract: This paper presents an integrated motion planning and control framework for a nonholonomic wheeled mobile manipulator (WMM) system taking advantage of the (differential) flatness property. We first develop the kinematic model of the system and analyze its flatness properties. Subsequently, a statically feedback linearizable system description is developed by appropriately choosing the flat outputs. Motion-planning can now be achieved by polynomial curve fitting to satisfying the terminal conditions in the flat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The system can be considered a subclass of a wheeled mobile manipulator with a wheeled mobile robot (excavator base) and a mounted multi-degree-of-freedom manipulator (excavator arm) [18]. ( , ) Each connection defines the network topology, and it allows the neurons to transmit a signal from one neuron to another.…”
Section: Dynamic Model Of the Excavatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The system can be considered a subclass of a wheeled mobile manipulator with a wheeled mobile robot (excavator base) and a mounted multi-degree-of-freedom manipulator (excavator arm) [18]. ( , ) Each connection defines the network topology, and it allows the neurons to transmit a signal from one neuron to another.…”
Section: Dynamic Model Of the Excavatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coordinate transformation is used. Examples of coordinate transformation are the chained form (Murray and Sastry, 1993), the power form (Pomet and Samson, 1994), the polar coordinates (Aicardi et al, 1995), the sigma process (Astolfi, 1996), the differential flatness approach (Lamiraux and Laumond, 2000;Tang et al, 2008;Ryu and Agarwal, 2010), and the transverse form (Morin and Samson, 2009). Several control algorithms proposed are the time-varying control (Samson, 1995;Tamba et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2015), discontinuous control (Lamiraux and Laumond, 2000), and the switching method (Hespanha and Morse, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Output tracking laws are easier to design and implement, and can be embedded in a sensorbased control architecture when the task is not fully known in advance. For this reason, with the exception of (Fruchard et al, 2005) that takes a somehow intermediate approach, most works on WMMs focus on kinematic control, e.g., (Bayle et al, 2002), (Luca et al, 2010), (Tang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%