2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of the 30 October 2020 Mw 7.0 Néon Karlovásion (Samos) earthquake in the Eastern Aegean Sea: Implications on source characteristics and dynamic rupture simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several distant stations are located on Greek Islands within this azimuthal range in our database and they result in larger residuals which represent the higher amplitudes than their predicted values. This inference corroborates the statement of "the possibility of a predominantly westward with less eastward directivity" highlighted by Ganas et al, 2021, Kiratzi, et al, 2021and Taymaz et al, 2022.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Source Directivity and Azimuthal Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several distant stations are located on Greek Islands within this azimuthal range in our database and they result in larger residuals which represent the higher amplitudes than their predicted values. This inference corroborates the statement of "the possibility of a predominantly westward with less eastward directivity" highlighted by Ganas et al, 2021, Kiratzi, et al, 2021and Taymaz et al, 2022.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Source Directivity and Azimuthal Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This fault movement caused uplift of Samos Island on the footwall side of the fault and subsidence on the hanging wall side, hence why the Greek Islands to the North of the epicentre saw higher tsunami run-up levels (Aktas et al, 2021). Considerable research efforts have also been dedicated to the identification of the finite fault models, many of which are compatible with each other for the mainshock (Kiratzi et al, 2021 (see Supplementary Table S1); Akinci et al, 2021;Karakostas et al, 2021;Chousianitis and Konca, 2021;Ganas et al, 2021;Taymaz et al, 2022). Kiratzi et al (2021) has established a mainshock slip model with thirty recordings chosen to represent all azimuth angles based on a finite fault inversion method.…”
Section: Brief Seismological Information Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the dipping direction remains unresolved from this method, which could be due to the similar dip angles of the two nodal planes as suggested in He and Ni (2017). With the constraint from near-field strong motion, Taymaz et al (2022) suggested a north-dipping model with updip and westward propagation of the bilateral rupture pattern could best fit teleseismic waveforms and well explain the aftershock distributions.…”
Section: Aftershock Distribution and Source Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…With the constraint from near‐field strong motion, Taymaz et al. (2022) suggested a north‐dipping model with updip and westward propagation of the bilateral rupture pattern could best fit teleseismic waveforms and well explain the aftershock distributions.…”
Section: Aftershock Distribution and Source Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation