1993
DOI: 10.1159/000156742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinesiological Characteristics of Vertical Climbing in Ateles geoffroyi and Macaca fuscata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This high angle of dorsiflexion during vertical climbing occurs in captive populations of gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon as well (23,24) and appears to be a strategy of climbing unique to the apes. Dorsiflexion is considerably less (Ϸ15-25°) during climbing bouts in cercopithecoid monkeys (24,25). Furthermore, maximum dorsiflexion during normal walking in modern humans is only 15-20°(26-28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high angle of dorsiflexion during vertical climbing occurs in captive populations of gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon as well (23,24) and appears to be a strategy of climbing unique to the apes. Dorsiflexion is considerably less (Ϸ15-25°) during climbing bouts in cercopithecoid monkeys (24,25). Furthermore, maximum dorsiflexion during normal walking in modern humans is only 15-20°(26-28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, the hindlimbs of primates, rats and squirrels were placed on or near the top of steeply inclined branches, suggesting a relationship between hindlimb placement and propulsive function (Hirasaki et al, 1993;Nakano, 2002). The gray short-tailed opossum, however, placed its hindlimbs more laterally than the forelimbs as they moved on 30deg inclines (Lammers et al, 2004;Lammers, 2007).…”
Section: Kinematic Changes On Inclined Branchesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Schmitt, 2010) and almost all studies focusing on climbing to date do not include kinetics (mammals: Nakano, 2002;Nyakatura et al, 2008;Schmidt and Fischer, 2010;Shapiro and Young, 2010;Stevens et al, 2011;lizards: Higham and Jayne, 2004a;Higham and Jayne, 2004b;Foster and Higham, 2012). Besides the studies of vertical climbing in Old and New World monkeys (Hirasaki et al, 1993;Hirasaki et al, 2000;Nakano, 2002;Hanna and Schmitt, 2011), only one study to date has investigated the kinetics of small-branch locomotion on shallow inclines and declines [in Monodelphis domestica (Lammers, 2007)]. In lizards, there exists a fair number of studies investigating the effect of sloped surfaces on running performance as well as one kinetic analysis of geckos running vertically (Huey and Hertz, 1982;Irschick and Jayne, 1998;Jayne and Irschick, 1999;Autumn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite theoretical assumptions, such as differences in force distribution between the forelimbs and hindlimbs (for details, see Lammers, 2007), deviations from these assumptions are likely to occur due to behavioral as well as morphological adaptations that differ between species (Nakano, 2002;Preuschoft, 2002). For example, peak vertical forces of the forelimbs and hindlimbs differ depending on the degree of climbing specialization in primate species moving on vertical inclines [Ateles geoffroy, Macaca fuscata (Hirasaki et al, 1993); Macaca fascicularis (Hanna and Schmitt, 2011)]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%