2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-015-5110-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic study of dehydration of calcium oxalate trihydrate

Abstract: The dehydration of calcium oxalate trihydrate was studied using DSC method and open sample crucibles. The dehydration proceeds in two steps where first two molecules of water are released around 80 °C and consequently the last molecule of water is released at a temperature around 130 °C. The kinetic analysis of overlapping peaks was done and the apparent activation energy, pre-exponential factor and kinetic exponents of kinetic model (reaction order model) were evaluated for both effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the dehydration enthalpy values, the data have to be normalized with respect to the mass of the same material COM (all the above-listed values are normalized on the overall sample mass, where the composition differs). For the second dehydration step (COM→anhydride) this transformation gives values 389 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 360 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 340 J•g_ COM -1 (present data), which is in reasonable agreement -the differences may be caused by slightly different dehydration enthalpies being associated with the particular COM morphologies (prisms, dendrites, elliptical cylinders). Similar calculation gives 681 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 713 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 112 J•g_ COM -1 (present data) for the first dehydration step.…”
Section: Sample Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to compare the dehydration enthalpy values, the data have to be normalized with respect to the mass of the same material COM (all the above-listed values are normalized on the overall sample mass, where the composition differs). For the second dehydration step (COM→anhydride) this transformation gives values 389 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 360 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 340 J•g_ COM -1 (present data), which is in reasonable agreement -the differences may be caused by slightly different dehydration enthalpies being associated with the particular COM morphologies (prisms, dendrites, elliptical cylinders). Similar calculation gives 681 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 713 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 112 J•g_ COM -1 (present data) for the first dehydration step.…”
Section: Sample Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For the second dehydration step (COM→anhydride) this transformation gives values 389 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 360 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 340 J•g_ COM -1 (present data), which is in reasonable agreement -the differences may be caused by slightly different dehydration enthalpies being associated with the particular COM morphologies (prisms, dendrites, elliptical cylinders). Similar calculation gives 681 J•g_ COM -1 [55], 713 J•g_ COM -1 [57] and 112 J•g_ COM -1 (present data) for the first dehydration step. Considering that a mixture of COT and COM was prepared during the present synthesis, the TG data suggest that approx.…”
Section: Sample Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations