2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics and operational parameters for 1,4-dioxane degradation by the photoelectro-peroxone process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CuO was significantly lower than that observed after the treatment in the absence of the catalysis. Catalytic oxidation with CuO increased the mineralization rate of the toxic intermediates formed during the 1,4-dioxane oxidation treatment, as also observed in the case of treatment by the photoelectron-peroxone process [68]. Notably, the toxicity of the samples treated by ozonation alone increased significantly during the treatment process, presumably due to the insignificant rate of mineralization observed, suggesting a gradual accumulation of toxic intermediates in solution, in agreement with the results obtained using the electro-peroxone process [69].…”
Section: Acute Toxicity Test With Vibrio Fischerisupporting
confidence: 62%
“…CuO was significantly lower than that observed after the treatment in the absence of the catalysis. Catalytic oxidation with CuO increased the mineralization rate of the toxic intermediates formed during the 1,4-dioxane oxidation treatment, as also observed in the case of treatment by the photoelectron-peroxone process [68]. Notably, the toxicity of the samples treated by ozonation alone increased significantly during the treatment process, presumably due to the insignificant rate of mineralization observed, suggesting a gradual accumulation of toxic intermediates in solution, in agreement with the results obtained using the electro-peroxone process [69].…”
Section: Acute Toxicity Test With Vibrio Fischerisupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In this research, as a merged procedure, the E-peroxone method not only considerably improved TOC removal but also significantly enhanced the energy efficiency for TOC elimination in comparison with the two separate procedures. In another report by Shen et al [ 35 ] the energy efficiency was investigated. In this study, after 45 min of treatment, the UV/O 3 , EP, and PEP procedures eliminated 70%, 37%, and 98% of TOC from 1,4-dioxane solutions with SEC of 0.38 kWh/g TOC removed, 0.22 kWh/g TOC removed, and 0.30 kWh/g TOC removed, respectively…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the application of these methods is to be considered in actual wastewater treatment, the energy cost as well as the operational cost must be known. In this regard, specific energy consumption (SEC) which defines the amount of electrical energy consumption (kWh) per unit mass of COD was calculated (Saien et al 2014;Shen et al 2017). When the process was based on the photochemical reaction, Eq.…”
Section: Uv Dose and Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) was used (Saien et al 2014), while in O 3 -based processes, SEC was calculated according to Eq. (5) (Shen et al 2017).…”
Section: Uv Dose and Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%