Large introductory STEM courses have
a reputation as “weed
out” classes. These classes and their laboratory components
are more often viewed by students as hurdles to overcome than valuable
learning experiences relevant to their future careers. This perception
especially impacts students who have a lower science identity and
self-efficacy compared to their peers, which is often true for students
who identify as being from groups historically underrepresented in
STEM or first-generation college students. In Fall 2020, the curriculum
for a second-semester organic chemistry course was redesigned as an
entirely remote, inquiry-based course focused on transferable skills.
The chemistry explored was epoxidation and epoxide-opening reactions,
which students learned about in lectures early in the semester. Students
evaluated reaction progress using real and complex data, and they
integrated their learning in the form of a final group presentation.
The emphasis of this course was on transferable skills, not specific
reactions or laboratory techniques. The latter were used as vehicles
by which to teach students how to analyze data, interpret results,
and develop their communication skills. Student survey responses demonstrated
that this remote course helped all students increase their self-efficacy
and science identity. However, in just one semester, the pre-existing
gaps in self-efficacy and science identity between students from underrepresented
groups (historically underrepresented groups and first-generation
college students) and their peers closed entirely. Taken together,
these results suggest the incredible value of an inquiry-based laboratory
curriculum, even in a remote course. This is a particularly valuable
approach in large introductory courses, which are a site of significant
attrition in STEM career pathways.