Communications(smooth or rough). Even for the single air flow, a difference exists for velocities of 25 and 30 m/s. This is probably due to a rather poor tangential and axial grid resolution compared to the radial resolution. These constraints in grid resolution were chosen in order to reduce the need for CPU time.
ConclusionThe implementation of a model is introduced, describing particle adhesion at a pipe wall in the pneumatic conveying of very fine particles, using existing software code (FLUENT 6). Basically, it could be shown that this model is suitable, in combination with the Euler-Lagrange approach, for describing the continuous and dispersed phase for the simulation of particle wall adhesion in a pipe. The influence of air velocity and loading on particle wall adhesion is determined qualitatively, in an accurate manner. Qualitatively, the modeling of wall roughness results in the correct values for pressure drop and particle wall collision frequency.The quantitative statement of the simulation has to be scrutinized since the grid resolution is obviously far from optimized.
AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the DFG for supporting this project financially in the scope of the SPP 1062.