[Retracted] Knockdown of PVT1 Exerts Neuroprotective Effects against Ischemic Stroke Injury through Regulation of miR‐214/Gpx1 Axis

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that lncRNA PVT1 was closely related to ischemic stroke. Here, the role of PVT1 in ischemic stroke and the underlying mechanism were investigated. OGDR-stimulated PC12 cells were used to construct a cell model to mimic ischemic stroke. si-PVT1, miR-214 mimic, inhibitor, or the negative controls were transfected into PC12 cells prior to OGDR treatment. PVT1, miR-214, and Gpx1 expression was measured by qRT-PCR and western blotting assays. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were tested by CCK-8 assay and western blotting. The expression levels of inflammatory factors were determined by ELISA Kit. Results showed that PVT1 was increased significantly in OGDR PC12 cells. PVT1 knockdown significantly enhanced cell viability and attenuated cell apoptosis, ROS generation, and inflammation in OGDR PC12 cells. More importantly, PVT1 or Gpx1 was a target of miR-214. Mechanistically, PVT1 acted as a competing endogenous RNA of miR-214 to regulate the downstream gene Gpx1. In conclusion, PVT1 knockdown attenuated OGDR PC12 cell injury by modulating miR-214/Gpx1 axis. These findings offer a potential novel strategy for ischemic stroke therapy.

Retracted: Knockdown of PVT1 Exerts Neuroprotective Effects against Ischemic Stroke Injury through Regulation of miR‐214/Gpx1 Axis

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”