2006
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.106161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knockin Mice with Ethanol-Insensitive α1-Containing γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors Display Selective Alterations in Behavioral Responses to Ethanol

Abstract: Despite the pervasiveness of alcohol (ethanol) use, it is unclear how the multiple molecular targets for ethanol contribute to its many behavioral effects. The function of GABA type A receptors (GABA A -Rs) is altered by ethanol, but there are multiple subtypes of these receptors, and thus far, individual subunits have not been definitively linked with specific behavioral actions. The ␣1 subunit of the GABA A -R is the most abundant ␣ subunit in the brain, and the goal of this study was to determine the role o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(52 reference statements)
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the latter finding, mice lacking the ␣6 subunit had ethanol-induced sleep times comparable with those in wild-type mice, whereas ␦ subunit knockout mice had mostly unaltered ethanol-induced behavioral effects (Homanics et al, 1997;Mihalek et al, 2001). In addition, the role of the ␣1 subunit in at least some effects of ethanol has been conclusively shown by experiments on knockout and knockin mice (Blednov et al, 2003;Kralic et al, 2003;Werner et al, 2006). Results from the present work further support the role of ␣1 subunit-containing receptors in ethanol-induced changes in the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Consistent with the latter finding, mice lacking the ␣6 subunit had ethanol-induced sleep times comparable with those in wild-type mice, whereas ␦ subunit knockout mice had mostly unaltered ethanol-induced behavioral effects (Homanics et al, 1997;Mihalek et al, 2001). In addition, the role of the ␣1 subunit in at least some effects of ethanol has been conclusively shown by experiments on knockout and knockin mice (Blednov et al, 2003;Kralic et al, 2003;Werner et al, 2006). Results from the present work further support the role of ␣1 subunit-containing receptors in ethanol-induced changes in the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A significant shortcoming of null mutant mice is that extensive compensation may occur in response to the deletion and may involve genes that are distinct from the deletion. One assumption underlying construction and use of KI mice is that they will display either no or limited compensation compared with knockout mice, thus providing an advantage over null mutants (Werner et al, 2006;Blednov et al, 2011;Harris et al, 2011). However, the mutations used in this study clearly impair the function of the GlyR, and we asked whether some of the changes in behavior that we observed were the result of compensation occurring during development or from the acute impairment in GlyR function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The hypnotic effects of ethanol were assessed using the LORR paradigm as described elsewhere (Werner et al, 2006). Briefly, all animals were cannulated using the procedures outlined above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%