2022
DOI: 10.31730/osf.io/vs3j5
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge and practices of open science among scholars and researchers in Tanzania

Abstract: The Open Science (OS) movement has been spreading rapidly among researchers with positive outcomes on accessibility of scientific knowledge. However, there is no clear evidence on the level of awareness and types of OS practices among scholars and researchers in Tanzania, potentially missing an opportunity to reap the rewards of the movement to scholarly pursuits. This study investigated the level of awareness of OS and practices among Tanzanian scholars and researchers. Findings of a digital survey conducted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One interviewee, in particular, emphasised the importance of regulation to foster meaningful knowledge co-creation, whereby local African researchers are equally involved in research collaborations and fairly acknowledged in resulting outputs. This finding concurs with other studies suggesting that most LMICs lack robust regulatory and governance structures [ 17 , 52 55 ]. Such insufficiencies in catering to the lawful and safe sharing or cross-border transferring of data caused some interviewees to experience first-hand consequences of neo-colonial science, also known as helicopter research, through exploitative research practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One interviewee, in particular, emphasised the importance of regulation to foster meaningful knowledge co-creation, whereby local African researchers are equally involved in research collaborations and fairly acknowledged in resulting outputs. This finding concurs with other studies suggesting that most LMICs lack robust regulatory and governance structures [ 17 , 52 55 ]. Such insufficiencies in catering to the lawful and safe sharing or cross-border transferring of data caused some interviewees to experience first-hand consequences of neo-colonial science, also known as helicopter research, through exploitative research practices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The African Open Science Platform serves as a digital revolution that can accelerate big data research in SSA and foster open science, yet the increased adoption of open data policies requiring the sharing of de-identified individual-level health research data makes data governance even more important [ 48 52 ]. Rather than making data openly available without restrictions, a couple of interviewees advocated for a DAC to review and manage data access requests given the committee’s expected technical expertise and knowledge of data governance to better address challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summarising our findings, the vast majority of respondents are familiar with the concept of OS in general terms, predominantly engaging in making their scientific publications open access. This supports the findings of previous survey studies, which concluded that open access is the most commonly adopted OS activity by researchers [19,20,21]. However, engagement with other OS activities, such as data sharing and FAIRification and preregistration of study designs, varies and needs greater support in policies, institutional frameworks and awareness-raising efforts (e.g., awareness of FAIR principles versus being involved in some steps of FAIRification).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A study on Knowledge and practices of open science among scholars and researchers in Tanzania by David et al, (2022) Ensure an effective R&D system and its impact on socio-economic activities.…”
Section: General Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%