2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge creation capability in MNC subsidiaries: Examining the roles of global and local knowledge inflows and subsidiary knowledge stocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative merits of the local environment and parent organization as sources of knowledge is however disputed. For example, Colakoglu, Yamao, & Lepak (2014) suggest that local knowledge inflows are more important for subsidiary innovation, while Asmussen, Foss, & Pedersen (2013) find that knowledge outflows more likely benefit other units in the MNE if they not only tap into the hostcountry knowledge base, but also combine relevant external and internal knowledge before the transfer.…”
Section: Resource-based Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative merits of the local environment and parent organization as sources of knowledge is however disputed. For example, Colakoglu, Yamao, & Lepak (2014) suggest that local knowledge inflows are more important for subsidiary innovation, while Asmussen, Foss, & Pedersen (2013) find that knowledge outflows more likely benefit other units in the MNE if they not only tap into the hostcountry knowledge base, but also combine relevant external and internal knowledge before the transfer.…”
Section: Resource-based Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge is an indispensable organizational capital (Colakoglu et al, 2014) that is built through synergetic contributions of individual knowledge. An organization's knowledge, which produces its strategic intelligence (Luu, 2013a), is especially crucial in health-care service since knowledge contributes to the improvement of treatment quality, reduction of clinical errors (Wheeler & Wheeler, 2005), and the sustainability of community health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this view, the ability of a subsidiary to create valuable and unique knowledge assets -not just to harness knowledge transferred from its parent firm -is a core part of the subsidiary-specific advantages that enable the subsidiary to perform effectively in the local market (Rugman & Verbeke, 2001). Thus, identifying the potential sequential processes through which a subsidiary creates valuable knowledge is increasingly important in enhancing the sustained competitive advantage of the entire MNC (Colakoglu, Yamao & Lepak, 2014;Fang, Fang, Jiang, Makino & Beamish, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the significance of understanding the knowledge creation capability of a subsidiary has been widely acknowledged in the MNC literature, relatively few empirical studies have been conducted in this line of enquiry (Andersson, Björkman, & Forsgren, 2005;Belderbos & Heijltjes, 2005;Colakoglu et al, 2014). First, with regard to antecedents to subsidiary knowledge creation, research has suggested that external knowledge flows to a subsidiary are a key factor enhancing the knowledge creation capability of the subsidiary, alongside other factors that facilitate the utilization of the sourced knowledge in the knowledge creation process (Almeida & Phene, 2004;Andersson et al, 2005;Colakoglu et al, 2014;Phene & Almeida, 2008). However, empirical studies did not fully support this view as they found that only external local knowledge inflows are conducive to subsidiary knowledge creation (e.g., Colakoglu et al, 2014;Phene & Almeida, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%