Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary sustainability science: Tools from applied critical realism

Abstract

Transdisciplinarity, which seeks to transcend the limits of existing disciplines and the boundaries between science and society, has become a hallmark of sustainability science. Since transdisciplinarity requires researchers to co‐produce knowledge by drawing together diverse knowledge systems, knowledge integration becomes a key challenge. However, the practice of knowledge integration brings to the fore tensions around philosophy, methodology and the role of the researcher. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the value of applied critical realism in enabling knowledge integration in transdisciplinary research, and in engaging these important tensions. I introduce tools from applied critical realism to enable knowledge integration across disciplinary and science‐society boundaries in sustainability science. Using an illustrative case of place‐based social‐ecological research from South Africa, I demonstrate the application of these tools. I conclude with a reflection on how they enable reflection on tensions related to philosophy, methodology and researcher positionality, identifying some of the challenges I experienced in putting these tools to work.

Understanding resilience in sustainable development: Rallying call or siren song?

“…This especially resonates with parallel calls on the need for transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development (Biswas & Miller, 2022;Cockburn, 2022;Kruijf et al, 2022). Once again, it is thanks to its lack of paradigmatic status that this resilience consensus can span multiple disciplines.…”

Connecting physical and social science datasets: challenges and pathways forward

“…Epistemological and methodological approaches used to generate physical and social science datasets commonly differ. For instance, research into Earth system science frequently prioritizes instrument-collected or computermodel-generated quantitative data and statistical analyses, often assumed to be objective and disconnected from the researcher's positionality (Cockburn 2022). Social science research includes diverse ontological, epistemological, and methodological approaches, from quantitative surveys undergirded by assumptions of objectivity to constructivist epistemologies that understand the researcher's interpretation of, for example, oral histories or discourses, as part of the data generation and results itself (Haraway 1988, Nightingale 2003, Lengwiler 2008, Bernard et al 2016, Freese and Peterson 2017.…”

“…• Establishing Early Working Relationships: Establish interdisciplinary partnerships early to consider how social and physical datasets may be collected and integrated across different phases of research design and analysis (Cockburn 2022). This may require larger team structures and longer project durations (Bukvic et al 2022).…”

Research−implementation organisations and their role for sustainable development

“…Of those concepts, transdisciplinary research has had a special standing within the scientific community, allowing to approach sustainability issues often transcending the conventional disciplinary scientific boundaries and that necessitate the contributions of non‐academic actors (Cockburn, 2022; Scholz & Steiner, 2015). Critically, transdisciplinary research offers a way to approach highly divisive issues that come with high stakes for the parties involved delivering both scientific evidence and practical, problem‐oriented solutions (Jahn et al, 2012; OECD, 2020a).…”