Knowledge Levels and their Transformation: Towards the Integration of Knowledge Creation and Individual Learning*

Abstract

 This paper shows the link between knowledge creation and individual learning, and the coherence that exists between the knowledge creation view and single and double-loop learning models. It does so by examining differences in levels of knowledge and their relationship with creativity and knowledge creating behaviours. The analysis shifts the focus from the abstract notion of tacit knowledge to a more specific discussion on creative human cognition. The paper is unique in adopting an endogenous perspective to the analysis of individual learning. The analysis is distinct from previous discussions on knowledge creation in three ways: (a) explicit and tacit knowledge are analysed in terms of the nature and degree of interdependence that exists between the two; (b) knowledge levels are defined in terms of their applications rather than as abstract concepts; and (c) a distinction is made between shifts and movements in knowledge to separate, and subsequently integrate, the information processing and creative dimensions of learning. Further, the paper highlights specific challenges and limitations/costs that are associated with the transfer/acquisition of knowledge levels, and argues that in the absence of a conscious effort, knowledge levels are acquired through mistakes and failures. Following that, various theoretical and managerial implications to facilitate knowledge creation are discussed.

Writing it down: suggestions for a new approach towards understanding pro-environmental behaviour

“…This supports Akbar (2003), who posits that 'changes in the frame of reference, or metanoia (Senge 1990), are activated due to learning why (Kim 1993) ' (p. 2002), and suggests that encouraging reflexivity, as the diary does, can enhance learning and subsequently inform behaviour.…”

Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs

“…Firms are also required to continuously learn (Lane et al, 2006) from their experiences and those of others to exploit knowledge better. Since learning is a self reinforcing process of knowledge creation (Akbar, 2003;Glazer, 1991), it makes it easier for firms to implement new knowledge. As such ACAP increases the speed at which firms can innovate (Lane et al, 2006).…”

Implicit leader development: The mentor role as prefatory leadership context

“…Another unique facet of the mentoring context lies in the immediacy of assessment in a mastery learning context. In other words, mistakes and their subsequent analysis for continuous improvement serve as the basis for learning (Akbar, 2003). Finally, specific to and couched within the goals of an educational context, where the aim is to serve and lead children, there is an implicit acceptance that one's leadership comprises more human and gentle means of influence that seek to guide development versus force performance.…”