2014
DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2014.499.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Management and Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation: A Conceptual Model

Abstract: The purpose of this research is examining the influence of organizational learning and knowledge management in enterprise resource planning implementation. This study is based on organizational learning, knowledge management and enterprise resource planning implementation. This research did not test all organizational factors and focus particularly on knowledge management capacity and absorptive capability. Enterprise resource planning implementation successful is a must. In today's global and competitor in bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper has determined the integration of multiple knowledge components with Comparing the empirical findings in this study with that in literature, we find that the four phases of KM lifecycle are consistent with existing research (Argote, 1999;Alavi and Leidner, 2001;Horwitch and Armacost, 2002;Metaxiotis, 2009;Candra, 2014). In each KM phase, there are important stakeholders to initiate and carry out KM activities during ERP systems implementation, as discussed in the "knowledge network model".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The paper has determined the integration of multiple knowledge components with Comparing the empirical findings in this study with that in literature, we find that the four phases of KM lifecycle are consistent with existing research (Argote, 1999;Alavi and Leidner, 2001;Horwitch and Armacost, 2002;Metaxiotis, 2009;Candra, 2014). In each KM phase, there are important stakeholders to initiate and carry out KM activities during ERP systems implementation, as discussed in the "knowledge network model".…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This study, along with Parry and Graves (2008) demonstrates how documentation determines the retention of up-to-date and relevant knowledge. The common knowledge retention driver is documentation based on literature which further demonstrates the relevance of the documentation for knowledge retention (Parry and Graves 2008;Tsai et al 2011;Candra 2014). Additionally, this study was able to specify the types of documents (such as user guides, functional documents, progress reports, Visio flow charts, process diagrams, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…During the current study, the knowledge-based theory (KBV) is considered as an appropriate theory for supporting the conceptual framework. The association amongst KBV and OI is important for association due to the essentiality of KM about innovation requires that it brings a scaffold in favour of the management in their attempt of developing and making organizational competence towards novelty (Candra, 2014). Therefore, OL as an intangible asset and its consequence on OI is perfectly consistent with the KBV (Vasenska, 2013).…”
Section: Background Of Studymentioning
confidence: 95%