2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge management and ERP: Complementary or contradictory?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
50
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
50
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly adopting firms do not perform better in terms of sales growth (SG) than non-adopting firms do. This is contrary to the findings by Kallunki et al (2011), Galy and Sauceda (2012) and Acar et al (2017), who found a positive relationship between ERP implementation and sales growth. This finding implies that the improvement of ROE and ROA of adopters compared to nonadopters can only be caused by two other effects, a better use of assets and/or relatively larger net profits due to lower costs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surprisingly adopting firms do not perform better in terms of sales growth (SG) than non-adopting firms do. This is contrary to the findings by Kallunki et al (2011), Galy and Sauceda (2012) and Acar et al (2017), who found a positive relationship between ERP implementation and sales growth. This finding implies that the improvement of ROE and ROA of adopters compared to nonadopters can only be caused by two other effects, a better use of assets and/or relatively larger net profits due to lower costs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…So the results of studies comparing before and after adoption performance data are positive, albeit limited. Kallunki et al (2011), Galy and Sauceda (2014), Kharuddin et al (2015) and Acar et al (2017) used questionnaires -sometimes in combination with actual financial firm data-to gather information on the effects of ERP implementation on financial and nonfinancial performance. These analyses show positive effects on -sometimes perceived, not actual-profitability and costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current knowledge economy, knowledge is not only the most important resource, but also an important source of power for ensuring a lean methodology. The improvement of production technology requires knowledge exploration, otherwise, it is difficult to meet the needs of modern enterprises [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge management can be defined as the purposeful and systematic management of processes, methods, and tools, making full use of the organisation's knowledge potential to form goals, make efficient decisions, create and implement the uniqueness and value of the organization. Scientists, when examining the process approach to knowledge management, distinguish between different combinations of knowledge management processes (Wiig, 1993;Meyer & Zack, 1996;Mcelroy, 1999;Probst, Raub, & Romhardt, 2000;Rollett, 2003;Becerra-Fernandez, Gonzalez, & Sabherwal, 2004;Lin & Lee, 2005;Franco & Mariano, 2007;Supyuenyong, Islam, & Kulkarni, 2009;Sun, 2010;Dalkir, 2011;O'Dell & Hubert, 2011;Pinho, Rego, & Pina e Cunha, 2012;Rusly, Corner, & Sun, 2012;Wee & Chua, 2013;Agarwal & Islam, 2014;Bigliardi, Galati, & Petroni, 2014;Obeidat, Masa' deh, & Abdallah, 2014;Ranjbarfard, Aghdasi, López-Sáez, & López, 2014;Chang & Lin, 2015;Hegazy & Ghorab, 2015;García-Fernández, 2015;Tubigi & Alshawi, 2015;Wahba, 2015;Costa & Monteiro, 2016;Hwang, 2016;Kianto, Vanhala, & Heilmann, 2016;Nowacki & Bachnik, 2016;Acar, Tarim, H. Zaim, S. Zaim, & Delen, 2017;Bican, Guderian, & Ringbeck, 2017;Chhim, Somers, & Chinnam, 2017;Koohang, Paliszkiewicz, & Goluchowski, 2017;Yusr, Mokhtar, Othman, & Sulaiman, 2017;Dzenopoljac...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%