2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge sharing: implications for downsizing and restructuring outcomes in Australian organisations

Abstract: Although downsizing and restructuring are topics of interest to both scholars and practitioners, little research has examined the impact of knowledge management and knowledge sharing on the outcomes of such events. With the growing importance of knowledge management to HRM practitioners, this research looks at the impact of knowledge sharing and the resulting organisational knowledge on the effectiveness of organisations after downsizing or restructuring. As well as being of concern to organisations undergoing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many scholars and practitioners view knowledge sharing practices as a strategic element yielding mutual benefits for employees and organizations (Peccei et al, 2005;Sitlington, 2012). Knowledge sharing as a research subject continues to receive increasing attention from both academia and business because of its relevance to organisational performance, measured by profitability and innovative practice Florea et al, 2013), and, moreover, to long-term organizational success (Kim et al, 2016;Aninkan and Oyewole, 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars and practitioners view knowledge sharing practices as a strategic element yielding mutual benefits for employees and organizations (Peccei et al, 2005;Sitlington, 2012). Knowledge sharing as a research subject continues to receive increasing attention from both academia and business because of its relevance to organisational performance, measured by profitability and innovative practice Florea et al, 2013), and, moreover, to long-term organizational success (Kim et al, 2016;Aninkan and Oyewole, 2014).…”
Section: Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, knowledge sharing is not a simple construct (Sitlington, 2012;Yen, Tseng, and Wang, 2014). Van den Hooff and De Ridder (2004) distinguished between denoting knowledge (i.e., communication with others about his/her personal intellectual capital) and collecting knowledge (i.e., consulting co-workers to get them to share their intellectual capital), and indicated that affective commitment has positive effects on both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge sharing is not an easy and a simple construct (Sitlington, 2012;Yen, Tseng, & Wang, 2014). Similarly, many researchers differentiated between KS (communicate with peers and others with colleagues about their intellectual capital) and collection of knowledge (consulting colleagues and co-workers for sharing of knowledge and intellectual capital).…”
Section: Affective Commitment and Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%