Knowledge translation and health technology reassessment: identifying synergy

Abstract

BackgroundHealth Technology Reassessment (HTR) is an emerging field that shifts the focus from traditional methods of technology adoption to managing technology throughout its lifecycle. HTR is a mechanism to improve patient care and system efficiency through a reallocation of resources away from low-value care towards interventions and technologies that are high value. To achieve this, the outputs of HTR and its recommendations must be translated into practice. The evolving field of knowledge translation (KT) can provide guidance to improve the uptake of evidence-informed policies and recommendations resulting from the process of HTR. This paper argues how the theories, models and frameworks from KT could advance the HTR process.DiscussionFirst, common KT theories, models and frameworks are presented. Second, facilitators and barriers to KT within the context of HTR are summarized from the literature. Facilitators and barriers to KT include ensuring a solid research evidence-base for the technology under reassessment, assessing the climate and context, understanding the social an political context, initiating linkage and exchange, having a structured HTR Process, adequate resources, and understanding the roles of researchers, knowledge users, and stakeholders can enhance knowledge translation of HTR outputs. Third, three case examples at the individual (micro), organizational (meso), and policy (macro) levels are used to illustrate to describe how a KT theory, model or framework could be applied to a HTR project. These case studies show how selecting and applying KT theories, models and frameworks can facilitate the implementation of HTR recommendations.ConclusionHTR and KT are synergistic processes that can be used to optimize technology use throughout its lifecycle. We argue that the application of KT theories, models and frameworks, and the assessment of barriers and facilitators to KT can facilitate translation of HTR recommendations into practice.

Community Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Introducing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Biobanking Evidence-Based Programs Within Medically Underserved Communities: A Community-Engaged Approach

“…Findings also support further training to address such knowledge gaps since increasing awareness and knowledge of the benefits of new medical approaches among community stakeholders can increase community buy-in and support for EBP. 24,25…”

Health Technology Agency insights: informing modification of a qualitative benefit risk framework for Health Technology Reassessment of prescription medications

“…Overarching challenges do exist in conducting and implementing HTR for medicinal products. These include: the lack of relevant evidence and comparative data; lack of transparent HTR mechanisms, heterogeneity in patient outcomes; lack of collaboration; political and social barriers; and stakeholder loss aversion, entitlement, inertia, and entrenchment (13;32–34).…”

Characteristics of knowledge translation theories, models and frameworks for health technology reassessment: expert perspectives through a qualitative exploration

“…Despite growing interest in the HTR field, implementation challenges of its outputs continue to exist [ 4 , 6 , 8 ]. Implementation challenges/barriers of HTR outputs have been described previously [ 9 ]. The implementation challenges of HTR outputs have been categorized into five categories: climate and context (individuals negative attitudes, overall sense of political will, and openness to research); linkage and exchange (underlying linkage and exchange between researchers and knowledge users, policy makers and stakeholders); research evidence, a structured HTR process and resources (timelines, relevance and local applicability of research); role of researchers and HTR (the role of researchers to facilitate the transfer of research which includes views of their own role, communication, skills and packaging of research results); and role of stakeholders, knowledge users and the health system in HTR (skills and expertise) [ 9 ].…”