Knowledge translation of research findings

Abstract

BackgroundOne of the most consistent findings from clinical and health services research is the failure to translate research into practice and policy. As a result of these evidence-practice and policy gaps, patients fail to benefit optimally from advances in healthcare and are exposed to unnecessary risks of iatrogenic harms, and healthcare systems are exposed to unnecessary expenditure resulting in significant opportunity costs. Over the last decade, there has been increasing international policy and research attention on how to reduce the evidence-practice and policy gap. In this paper, we summarise the current concepts and evidence to guide knowledge translation activities, defined as T2 research (the translation of new clinical knowledge into improved health). We structure the article around five key questions: what should be transferred; to whom should research knowledge be transferred; by whom should research knowledge be transferred; how should research knowledge be transferred; and, with what effect should research knowledge be transferred?DiscussionWe suggest that the basic unit of knowledge translation should usually be up-to-date systematic reviews or other syntheses of research findings. Knowledge translators need to identify the key messages for different target audiences and to fashion these in language and knowledge translation products that are easily assimilated by different audiences. The relative importance of knowledge translation to different target audiences will vary by the type of research and appropriate endpoints of knowledge translation may vary across different stakeholder groups. There are a large number of planned knowledge translation models, derived from different disciplinary, contextual (i.e., setting), and target audience viewpoints. Most of these suggest that planned knowledge translation for healthcare professionals and consumers is more likely to be successful if the choice of knowledge translation strategy is informed by an assessment of the likely barriers and facilitators. Although our evidence on the likely effectiveness of different strategies to overcome specific barriers remains incomplete, there is a range of informative systematic reviews of interventions aimed at healthcare professionals and consumers (i.e., patients, family members, and informal carers) and of factors important to research use by policy makers.SummaryThere is a substantial (if incomplete) evidence base to guide choice of knowledge translation activities targeting healthcare professionals and consumers. The evidence base on the effects of different knowledge translation approaches targeting healthcare policy makers and senior managers is much weaker but there are a profusion of innovative approaches that warrant further evaluation.

Implementation of fall prevention in residential care facilities: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators

“…A better understanding of these factors and their effect on the implementation process is necessary. Effective fall prevention must consist of multifactorial interventions that target each resident's fall risk profile, and should be tailored to address context-specific barriers and put into action the identified facilitators Grimshaw et al, 2012;Lamb et al, 2011;Vlaeyen et al, 2015).…”

“…In terms of clinical implications, implementation of interventions should focus on modifiable determinants such as communication, knowledge, and skills (Grimshaw et al, 2012;Grol and Grimshaw, 2003;Grol and Wensing, 2004). Residential care facilities seeking to improve fall prevention could use this systematic overview to identify and address their facility-specific challenges.…”

“…It should be clear that change takes time and, a structured implementation plan with clear goals and priorities should be developed. Thus, fall prevention implementation in residential care facilities is complex and requires efforts focused on the proper modifiable factors (Baker et al, 2015, Flottorp et al, 2013Grimshaw et al, 2012;Grol and Grimshaw, 2003). In order to identify potential fall prevention determinants, to understand the relationship between determinants, and to tailor effective implementation strategies, further research is needed.…”

The Benefits of Online Health Communities

“…Patients' ability to receive emotional support is good for their health [14], active and informed patients may have better outcomes [15], and new research results may translate into practice (though that is often easier said than done) [16]. Unfortunately, the US does not yet have a perfect mechanism for reducing or eliminating the risk of sharing such information online.…”

Ready to deliver maternal and newborn care? Health providers’ perceptions of their work context in rural Mozambique

“…The poor quality of care is due not only to constraints on human and financial resources, and weak-functioning health systems [3], but also to the failure to adopt appropriate strategies to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) [4,5]. Policy-makers must recognize the importance of the healthcare context, not only as an influence on the adoption of appropriate implementation strategies, but also as a modifier of the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing health providers’ performance and improving quality of care [6].…”