Konsep Berpikir Suku Batak Toba: Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au

Abstract

Batak Toba tribe has many philosophies of life. One of the philosophy is Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au. This study aims to determine how the concept of thinking and perspective of Batak Toba parents living in the city of Palangka Raya in interpreting the philosophy of Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the philosophy of Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au is still very attached to the parents of the Batak Toba tribe in Palangka Raya. This philosophy means that children are the pride, honor, wealth, and most valuable possessions for the family. Parents always instill this philosophy in children from an early age, with the hope that children and the next generation will continue to carry the identity of the Batak family and internalize the values ​​contained in the philosophy of the Batak Toba tribe in life.
 Suku Batak Toba memiliki banyak filosofi kehidupan atau pedoman hidup. Salah satu filosofi tersebut adalah Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana konsep berpikir dan perpektif orang tua suku Batak Toba yang tinggal di kota Palangka Raya dalam memaknai filosofi Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au. Metode penelitin yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa filosofi Anakkon Hi Do Hamoraon di Au masih sangat melekat pada orang tua suku Batak Toba di Palangka Raya. Filosofi ini berarti bahwa anak kebanggaan, kehormatan, kekayaan, dan harta yang paling berharga bagi keluarga. Orang tua selalu menanamkan filosofi ini kepada anak sejak dini, dengan harapan anak dan generasi selanjutnya tetap membawa identitas keluarga Batak serta menginternalisasi nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam filosofi suku Batak Toba di dalam kehidupan.

Rethinking Juan Luis Segundo: Phenomenological Philosophy, Existentialism and Liberation Theology

“…Catholic religious education at that time which was asymmetrical in the process of goals (Haloho, 2022b(Haloho, , 2022aLumbanraja, 2021;Netanyahu & Susanto, 2022;Pattiasina, 2021;Pattiasina et al, 2022; Jurnal Pendidikan West Science Prakosa et al, 2023;Setinawati et al, 2021;Surya, 2021Surya, , 2023aSurya, , 2023bSurya, , 2020. The purpose of Catholic religious education is asymmetrical in the ethical group and the minority group.…”

What is an Academic Journey [Marks, Interpretations, and Objects]?: Reflections by the Theories of Charles Sanders Peirce

“…In order to establish a connection between interpretation and meaning, a triadic relationship, which Peirce refers to as a 'sign', is necessary (Charles Sanders Peirce, 2014). The sign referred to here is known as a representamen, meaning something that represents or stands for something else (Angellyna, 2021;Haloho, 2016Haloho, , 2022bHaloho, , 2022cHaloho, , 2022aHaloho, , 2023Haloho, Sembiring, & Manurung, 2013;Lumbanraja, 2021;Rahmelia et al, 2022;Sepniwati, 2022;Timan Herdi Ginting, Colina, & Haloho, 2022). In addition to discussing signs, Peirce also addresses the concept of objects.…”

Michael Riffaterre: Intertextuality, l’aporie Littéraire, Aesthetics, and Semiotics

“…On the other hand, readers can utilize the tools available to them, such as memorization, recollection, and coding of keywords. Therefore, meaning cannot be singular, hegemonic, or exclusive to any particular group (Haloho, 2016(Haloho, , 2022bHaloho, Sembiring, & Manurung, 2013;; (Haloho, 2022a(Haloho, , 2022c(Haloho, , 2023Maidiantius Tanyid, 2018Maidiantus Tanyid & Kataruhan, 2023;Timan Herdi Ginting, Colina, & Haloho, 2022). At that point, meaning becomes unequal, politicized, and power and authority are perpetuated by the exclusion of those who experience the loss of meaning, which includes a variety of semiotics.…”