2005
DOI: 10.1515/9783110906066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kosmopolitismus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify that the proposed test generation method is capable of reducing TC numbers, it is applied to multiple circuits shown in Table II. Circuits s420, s820 and s15850 are from ISCAS89 benchmarks [28], b14, b15 and b17 are from IWLS2005 benchmarks [29], alu4, cordic and misex3 are from MCNC benchmarks [30], and the remaining circuits are from EPFL benchmarks [31]. Some details regarding TC generation shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify that the proposed test generation method is capable of reducing TC numbers, it is applied to multiple circuits shown in Table II. Circuits s420, s820 and s15850 are from ISCAS89 benchmarks [28], b14, b15 and b17 are from IWLS2005 benchmarks [29], alu4, cordic and misex3 are from MCNC benchmarks [30], and the remaining circuits are from EPFL benchmarks [31]. Some details regarding TC generation shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benchmarks consist of 69 circuits in total, including very large-scale circuits with up to twenty million nodes. In terms of open-source benchmarks, we use the EPFL [47] and IWLS [71] benchmarks, which are commonly used in previous work on LS [1], [2], [44], [72]. In terms of the industrial benchmark, we use 27 circuits from Huawei HiSilicon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we evaluate the offline prediction recall, online runtime, and online optimization performance on the open-source EPFL [47] and IWLS [71] benchmarks. Due to limited space, we defer more detailed results to Appendix B.5.…”
Section: Evaluation On Open-source Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to evaluate the proposed watermark technique on various benchmark circuits. Terefore, the evaluation of the proposed watermark techniques is carried out on EPFL [55] and IWLS [56] benchmark suites, from which the parameters such as the probability of coincidence (Pc) [57], area overhead, and latency are estimated by designing for data and delay mentioned in Case 3. Tese parameters are and summarized the table format for each circuit before and after the watermark is being integrated with it.…”
Section: Evaluation On Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%