1973
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(73)90188-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kp index correlations with solar-wind parameters during the first and second stages of a recurrent geomagnetic storm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different explanations have been presented for the geomagnetic activity associated with CIRs. Bobrov [1973] suggested it was due to the highly fluctuating southward component of IMF. Burlaga and Lepping [1977] considered that the electric field, Ey, was the determinant parameter for geomagnetic activity.…”
Section: Results Of Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different explanations have been presented for the geomagnetic activity associated with CIRs. Bobrov [1973] suggested it was due to the highly fluctuating southward component of IMF. Burlaga and Lepping [1977] considered that the electric field, Ey, was the determinant parameter for geomagnetic activity.…”
Section: Results Of Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by Borovsky and Gosling [2001], if there is an enhanced viscous interaction controlled by the amplitude of the turbulence in the solar wind, then there should be correlations between the solar wind turbulence amplitude and the geomagnetic indices. Although largely ignored at present, such correlations have been found in the past [ Ballif et al , 1967, 1969; Hirshberg and Colburn , 1969; Bobrov , 1973; Garrett , 1974; Garrett et al , 1974]. Two physical interpretations of these correlations have been given.…”
Section: Eddy‐viscosity Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now established that statistical properties of the solar wind are dominated by large-amplitude fluctuations at small scales and present signatures of intermittency [Marsch andTu, 1994, 1997;Sorriso-Valvo et al, 1999;Alexandrova et al, 2008;Uritsky et al, 2011;Osman et al, 2012;Alexandrova et al, 2013]. Even though the possible influence of solar wind turbulence on geomagnetic activity has been long recognized Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 10.1002/2015JA021505 with studies investigating possible coupling between solar wind fluctuations and geomagnetic activity [Ballif et al, 1967[Ballif et al, , 1969Hirshberg and Colburn, 1969;Garrett et al, 1974;Garrett, 1974;Bobrov, 1973], statistical, comprehensive observational, and numerical studies of the impact of solar wind fluctuations on magnetospheric dynamic (as compared to steady state) processes are less frequent [Tsurutani and Gonzalez, 1987;Chen et al, 1993Chen et al, , 1994Borovsky and Funsten, 2003;Pulkkinen et al, 2006aPulkkinen et al, , 2006bD'Amicis et al, 2007;Jankoviċovà et al, 2008;D'Amicis et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2010;Claudepierre et al, 2010;Ilie et al, 2010aIlie et al, , 2010bLiemohn et al, 2011;McGregor et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%