2018
DOI: 10.1002/nla.2188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Krylov eigenvalue strategy using the FEAST algorithm with inexact system solves

Abstract: Summary The FEAST eigenvalue algorithm is a subspace iteration algorithm that uses contour integration to obtain the eigenvectors of a matrix for the eigenvalues that are located in any user‐defined region in the complex plane. By computing small numbers of eigenvalues in specific regions of the complex plane, FEAST is able to naturally parallelize the solution of eigenvalue problems by solving for multiple eigenpairs simultaneously. The traditional FEAST algorithm is implemented by directly solving collection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike a contour integral-based FEAST eigensolver, where P S is expressed as a contour integral and is approximated by a numerical quadrature, which needs to solve a sequence of large shifted linear systems whose number is the number of nodes times the subspace dimension at each iteration. In order to ensure that the FEAST solver converges linearly, approximate solutions of the shifted linear systems must have increasing accuracy as outer iterations proceeds [7,31], causing that the method may be very costly. Even worse, the accuracy requirement may not be ensured when a shifted linear system is ill conditioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike a contour integral-based FEAST eigensolver, where P S is expressed as a contour integral and is approximated by a numerical quadrature, which needs to solve a sequence of large shifted linear systems whose number is the number of nodes times the subspace dimension at each iteration. In order to ensure that the FEAST solver converges linearly, approximate solutions of the shifted linear systems must have increasing accuracy as outer iterations proceeds [7,31], causing that the method may be very costly. Even worse, the accuracy requirement may not be ensured when a shifted linear system is ill conditioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each linear system can be solved independently from the others, this class of eigensolvers naturally lends itself to multiple layers of parallelism, making contourbased eigensolvers especially well suited for today's increasingly parallel computer architectures. As shown in several recent publications, the performance of the eigensolver depends on the effectiveness of the spectral filter r(A, B) [18,35,12,2,5,9]. Recently, the authors of [36] proposed a numerical optimization approach alternative to the standard quadrature rules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Hermitian eigenproblem Ax = λx with λ ∈ [a, b] ⊂ R, the last decade has seen the emergence of a new class of eigensolvers based on spectral projectors. Such eigensolvers are typically expressed as integrals of the spectral resolvent (A − zI) −1 over a contour in the complex plane that encloses the interval [a, b] [32,33,31,9,21]. Numerical quadrature transforms the contour integral into a matrix-valued rational function with complex coefficients β i and poles z i .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plan to combine this approach with relaxed stopping criteria for solving the linear systems in BEAST-C and -M iteratively; cf. also [9,10] for related work.…”
Section: Changing Precision In Subspace Iteration-based Eigensolversmentioning
confidence: 99%