Kurumsal Yöneti̇m Ve Fi̇rma Performansi: Topsis Yöntemi̇ İle Bist 30 Fi̇rmalari Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Uygulama

Ünlü, Ulaş; Yalçın, Neşe; Yağlı, İbrahim

doi:10.16953/deusbed.09673

Cited by 25 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The lower 7 criteria were equally weighted by the weight of the group, as there were not enough expert knowledge on change ratios and MVA margin. For the top two criteria in the hybrid method, weighting is determined for VFP group as 71% while for AFP group as 29%, based on the average of previous studies in the literature (Yalçın et al, 2012;Alvandi et al, 2013;Esbouei et al, 2014;Ghadikolaei et al, 2014;Ünlü et al, 2017). Since the sub-criteria were equally weighted, weighting for each member of the three VFP groups was determined as 23.7%, while for each member of the four AFP groups was designated as 7.3%.…”

Section: Hybrid Weightingmentioning

confidence: 99%

An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul

Baydaş

Elma

2021

Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Financial performance research with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, is a common subject of study not only for researchers in the finance literature but also in the applied sciences. Financial performance manifests itself in an internal universe that a firm can directly control, while the share return of the same firm is shaped synchronically in an external universe that cannot be controlled directly. On the other hand, preferring the most suitable MCDM and weighting method to use in measuring financial performance is often regarded as a source of uncertainty. In this study, the share price is used as an external proxy and a tool for comparing MCDM methods, completely different from the previously proposed approaches based on the superiority of internal features. This study was conducted on 131 manufacturing companies in Borsa Istanbul, covering entire 20-quarter period between 2014 and 2018. The experimental findings of the study provide valid solutions for the MCDM and weighting selection problem, that can be proposed as a practical and indirect solution. The results show that preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) method used with hybrid weighting technique produced by far the best performance rankings in 19 out of 20 quarterly periods when compared to the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and weighted sum approach (WSA).

show abstract

Section: Hybrid Weightingmentioning

confidence: 99%

An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul

Baydaş

Elma

2021

Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Country rankings were determined by Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis Ratio Analysis (MOORA) [21]. The performances of firms in Exchange İstanbul 30 Index were compared by implementing CRITIC and TOPSIS [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material Selection for Microstrip Antenna Using Critic-Miacra Integration as a Practical Approach

Güler

Can

2020

Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology a - Applied Sciences and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Selection of suitable material is a critical step in microstrip antenna design. Dielectric constant, thermal expansion coefficient, conductivity, mechanical properties and weight are the leading material properties in material selection. In addition to these factors, environmental impact, cost and size are among the most prominent design criteria. In this study a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) structure for material selection analysis in microstrip antenna production, is proposed. In this context, CRITIC-MAIRCA integration which is one of the MCDM approaches utilized to determine the best material for microstrip antenna. Dielectric constant, loss tangent and thermal expansion coefficient criteria are considered to select the best among eighteen different materials. The impact of each criterion on selection process is computed via CRITIC. To rank the alternatives taking into account criteria weights, MAIRCA was utilized. As a result, BaSrTi2O6 (bulk form) was found to be the best material for microstrip antenna manufacturing. This study provides an initial insight to practical material selection.

show abstract

The effect of corporate governance on bank performance: evidence from Turkish and some MENA countries banks

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kurumsal Yöneti̇m Ve Fi̇rma Performansi: Topsis Yöntemi̇ İle Bist 30 Fi̇rmalari Üzeri̇ne Bi̇r Uygulama

Abstract: Öz

Cited by 25 publications

References 7 publications

An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul

An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul

Material Selection for Microstrip Antenna Using Critic-Miacra Integration as a Practical Approach

The effect of corporate governance on bank performance: evidence from Turkish and some MENA countries banks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About