L'altermondialisation en réseaux. Trajectoires militantes, multipositionnalité et formes de l'engagement: les participants du contre-sommet du G8 d'Evian

Abstract

L'altermondialisme en réseaux. Trajectoires militantes, multipositionnalité et formes de l'engagement : les participants du contre-sommet du G8 d'Evian Olivier Fillieule, Philippe Blanchard, Eric Agrikoliansky, Marko Bandler, Florence Passy, Isabelle Sommier A partir d'un traitement des multiappartenances déclarées par 2 280 militants interviewés lors du contre sommet du G8, les auteurs reconstruisent la nébuleuse des organisations parties prenantes dans l'événement. Ces multiappartenances rendent compte à la fois des alignements entre organisations et des affiliations des individus qui circulent entre ces organisations. Une classification ascendante hiérarchique permet d'ébaucher un champ multiorganisationnel structuré en cinq pôles de tailles variables, qui témoignent de l'hétérogénéité des groupes engagés. Les militants les plus multi-engagés, les plus actifs politiquement et les plus expérimentés en matière de mobilisation, maintiennent la cohérence de ce réseau. Leur contraste avec les primo-engagés, novices de l'altermondialisme, laisse entrevoir la diachronie des carrières militantes.

Observing Protest from a Place: The World Social Forum in Dakar (2011)

“…the chapter devoted to Latin Americans in the present volume. 19 Fillieule et al (2004) divide the anti-G8 population into four groups: the uncommitted (23%); the mono-committed (18%), particularly present in young, politicized GJM organizations; those involved in 2-6 organizations (49%) and those involved in 7 or more organizations (9%), with a broader range of commitments among the 21 types proposed. second gauges the effects of the repertoire of available actions on the form of activist involvement.…”

“…Furthermore, 54% of the respondents talked about politics often or very often with their colleagues at work, 65% at home with their families, and 80% with their friends. Among their social relations, 36% were active and 12% very active in the alter-global movement (Fillieule et al, 2004). The osmosis appeared even stronger in 2011: 66.8% of the friends of WSF participants, 71.51% of their colleagues, and 31.62% of their families were either very or rather active.…”

Globalization and the collective action of the socially excluded in France: At the heart of the margins?

“…During this same period, events taking place on the margins of the forums and summits experienced a rise in popularity, supported by the most radical fringe elements of alterglobalization. Consider, for example, the creation of the intergalactic village at the countersummit in Évian in 2003 (Fillieule et al, 2004) This transformation of alter-globalization undoubtedly played a role in pushing the have-nots to the periphery of the movement, insofar as the players with more resources (unions, organizations such as ATTAC) attempted to distance themselves from the more radical have-nots tactics and to create legitimacy with the wider public less inclined to accept "activist overflow." But there is more.…”

Os novos movimentos de protesto em França. A articulação de novas arenas públicas

“…Por seu lado, novos espaços de representação, de peritagem e de negociação ganharam legitimidade. Assiste-se a uma pluralização das formas de regime democrático e a uma europeização, senão mesmo globalização das questões públicas (Fillieule et al, 2004).…”