“…Previous studies on students' and teachers' representations (McAllister & Narcy-Combes, 2015;McAllister et al, 2012;Narcy-Combes & McAllister, 2011; on the development of accuracy, fluency, and complexity of written production between the beginning and the end of the programme (McAllister, 2013;McAllister & Belan, 2014) and on the students' use of the virtual resource center (McAllister, 2013;Starkey-Perret, McAllister, Belan, & Ngo, 2015) showed that although the programme is generally appreciated for the opportunities it generates for small-group interaction (McAllister et al, 2012;Starkey-Perret et al, 2012), students and teachers tend to prefer a PPP approach, claiming that TBLT does not leave sufficient room for FonF (Belan & Buck, 2012;McAllister, 2013). Questionnaire studies carried out with the students showed that the way 'grammar' is dealt with is the least satisfactory element of the programme and that there simply is not enough FonF (Belan & Buck, 2012).…”