L’attribution de la nationalité à l’épreuve de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme

Principled resistance and future of the ECtHR

“…Finally, the interpretative role of the ECtHR has been the subject of a recent formalisation. The invasion of the ECTHR into the process of discussions and of the reform proposals of the conventional system requires the strengthening of the principle of subsidiarity and the use of the margin of appreciation in the action of the ECtHR (Grabenwarter, 2014;Marchadier, 2014;Ziegler et al, 2015;Davis, 2016;Gerards & Lambrecht, 2018;Kälin & Künzli, 2019;Glas, 2020;Kunz, 2020;Alves Pinto, 2020).…”

“…In practice we can note the case of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (Grabenwarter, 2014;Harris et al, 2014;Marchadier, 2014;Schabas, 2015;Seibert-Fohr & Villiger, 2017;Rainey et al, 2017;Costa, 2017;Nussberger, 2020) as an example of this type of trend. Of course, the first problem is that the ECHR includes the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as a jurisdictional body in the case of resolving human rights disputes as a Court super partes.…”