2019
DOI: 10.4000/trema.5460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L’évaluation de la dimension architecturale des établissements scolaires récents. Enquête sur le ressenti des collégiens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, studies interested in the effects of the physical layout at school have been able to identify certain parameters of the architectural feature (e.g. natural light, space, acoustic quality, air quality) having positive effects on various indicators of student learning, success and persistence, mental health and well-being (Allaire 2013;Barrett et al 2017;Cheryan et al 2014;Hébert and Dugas 2019). Other studies have shown that the aesthetics, safety and cleanliness of school spaces positively influence academic performance, sense of belonging, practices aimed at meeting students' needs and their mental health (Cheryan et al 2014;Joing et al 2018;Vallot 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, studies interested in the effects of the physical layout at school have been able to identify certain parameters of the architectural feature (e.g. natural light, space, acoustic quality, air quality) having positive effects on various indicators of student learning, success and persistence, mental health and well-being (Allaire 2013;Barrett et al 2017;Cheryan et al 2014;Hébert and Dugas 2019). Other studies have shown that the aesthetics, safety and cleanliness of school spaces positively influence academic performance, sense of belonging, practices aimed at meeting students' needs and their mental health (Cheryan et al 2014;Joing et al 2018;Vallot 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les élèves font donc des choix personnels et stratégiques entre différentes surfaces de travail possibles, tailles et hauteurs d'assises, positions corporelles, mais aussi de zones d'apprentissage (Havig, 2017;Laquerre, 2018). La classe est aménagée en espaces adaptés aux objectifs pédagogiques et aux types de comportements attendus : zone de lecture, zone de concentration, zone de collaboration, zone d'évaluation, etc., et se base sur le précepte qu'architecture, aménagement et pédagogie doivent être pensés pour répondre aux besoins développementaux des élèves et créer un environnement d'apprentissage optimal (Hébert et Dugas, 2019). Par l'aménagement et la diversité de son mobilier et des équipements mis à disposition, la classe flexible est réputée pouvoir favoriser le désir d'exploration des élèves (Abbasi, 2013).…”
Section: La Classe Flexibleunclassified