2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.00152
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L1-Adaptive MPPI Architecture for Robust and Agile Control of Multirotors

Jintasit Pravitra,
Kasey A. Ackerman,
Chengyu Cao
et al.

Abstract: This paper presents a multirotor control architecture, where Model Predictive Path Integral Control (MPPI) and L1 adaptive control are combined to achieve both fast model predictive trajectory planning and robust trajectory tracking. MPPI provides a framework to solve nonlinear MPC with complex cost functions in real-time. However, it often lacks robustness, especially when the simulated dynamics are different from the true dynamics. We show that the L1 adaptive controller robustifies the architecture, allowin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Nakka et al, 2020) the learned dynamics is projected into a finite-dimensional space using generalized polynomial chaos, and the trajectory planning problem is written as a convex optimization problem based on the approximated dynamics. Pravitra et al (2020) used model predictive path integral control (MPPI) for motion planning, and used L1 adaptive control for handling the potential mismatch between the nominal and true dynamics. Koller et al (2018) and Wabersich and Zeilinger (2020a,b) propose learning-based model predictive control (MPC) schemes that provide high-probability safety guarantees throughout the learning process using GPs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Nakka et al, 2020) the learned dynamics is projected into a finite-dimensional space using generalized polynomial chaos, and the trajectory planning problem is written as a convex optimization problem based on the approximated dynamics. Pravitra et al (2020) used model predictive path integral control (MPPI) for motion planning, and used L1 adaptive control for handling the potential mismatch between the nominal and true dynamics. Koller et al (2018) and Wabersich and Zeilinger (2020a,b) propose learning-based model predictive control (MPC) schemes that provide high-probability safety guarantees throughout the learning process using GPs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [34] a Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) controller was coupled with a nonlinear reference model L 1 adaptive controller for agile quadrotor flight, however the authors have not shown feasibility of the proposed method on real hardware. No analsis of the adaptive control signal is provided, however video footage released of the simulation performance of the proposed L 1 -MPPI architecture indicates highly oscillatory control performance in the first-person camera view 1 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implement the L 1 adaptive controller using a nonlinear reference model [40], which estimates both matched and unmatched uncertainties using a piecewise constant adaptation law [41,42]. The derivation is similar to [34], however we account for the uncertainties directly at the rotor thrust level. First, define R I B = e B x , e B y , e B z as the rotation matrix from the body frame to the inertial frame.…”
Section: L 1 -Adaptive Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To guide the sampling distribution safely in case of external disturbances while keeping the control proactive, a sampling-based Tube-MPC method is augmented in [4] with an iterative linear quadratic Gaussian controller for sampling distribution guidance and disturbance rejection. Model predictive path integral control [6] is integrated with L1 adaptive control in [13] to achieve both fast model predictive trajectory planning and robust trajectory tracking. Besides, the minimum intervention principle has shown an increasing interest in the safe control domain of semi-autonomous vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%