La Calidad en Uso y la Evaluación Informática en la Formación de Líderes de Proyectos

Abstract

En el mundo globalizado se requiere contar con ingenieros líderes de proyectos, que puedan realizar labores de evaluadores de proyectos con éxito. El sistema propuesto permite hacer un análisis comparativo de los diferentes proyectos participantes en eventos de invención, innovación y creatividad, basados en sus características de calidad en uso, funcionalidad y usabilidad, mediante un plan de métricas externas y de calidad en uso. El modelo está basado en normas internacionales (ISO/IEC 9126, 14598, IEEE 1061) y modelos mexicanos (MECHDAV), y software propuesto, es desarrollado en un ambiente visual WEB, para dispositivos móviles (tabletas), permiten evaluar genéricamente la calidad de los proyectos-productos-servicios que participan en los concursos mencionados; este sistema proporciona un soporte a las personas evaluadoras (jurados) para emitir dictámenes imparciales con mayor precisión cuantitativa. Este sistema está dirigido a organizaciones, empresas y usuarios finales que necesiten seleccionar, fácilmente, los proyectos desarrollados con más calidad, para ser los ganadores en estos concursos. Se proporciona una guía para la instrumentación concreta de la evaluación, así como sus rangos, la presentación, procedimientos y documentación.
 
 In the globalized world, the participation of leading project engineers who can successfully perform project evaluators' work, is required. The proposed system allows to make a comparative analysis of the different projects participating in events of invention, innovation and creativity, based on their characteristics of quality in use, functionality and usability, through a plan of external metrics and quality in use. The model is based on international standards (ISO / IEC 9126, 14598, IEEE 1061) and Mexican models (MECHDAV), and the proposed software is developed in a visual WEB environment for mobile devices (tablets), allow to evaluate the quality generically Of the projects-products-services involved in the aforementioned competitions; This system provides support to evaluators (juries) to issue impartial opinions with greater quantitative accuracy. This system is aimed at organizations, companies and end users who need to easily select the projects developed with the highest quality, to be the winners in these competitions. A guide is provided for the specific instrumentation of the evaluation, as well as its ranks, presentation, procedures and documentation.

Project Evaluation Methodology and Software Tool for Innovation Contests

“…Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 show some representative screens of some of the proposed prototypes, to evaluate the projects in the innovation contests selected for testing in different academic levels of participation. This prototype has been tested in Mexico at the Creative National System of Higher Education Technology State Competitions organized by different universities, and at national contests organized by the National Institute for Women, at the National Thesis Competitions and at the National Contests and Exhibition Projects linking different government sectors [16], [21], [22], [24].…”

“…That is why we select MECHDAV-MECRAD [14]. Further, we select the PROYEVA [21], [22], [24] model to apply a metrics program. Let us now present, and then discuss, the proposed methodology (Figure 1).…”

“…It is the combined product quality effect of the characteristics as perceived by the user. [21], [22], [23], [24].…”

“…In many cases, the juries must determine a project quality in-use values, based upon subjective criteria, not allowing an objective evaluation of important characteristics as functionality or usability. [6], [7], [8], [9], [21], [24].…”

“…The model introduced is based on international standards IEEE610 [1], IEEE1061 [2], ISO / IEC 9126 [3], ISO / IEC 14598 [4], Project SQUARE (ISO 25000) [5], SUMI [6] and others, as well as in other Mexican models (MECHDAV-MECRAD [14], [17], [18], [20]), [21]), PROYEVA-PROJEVA [15], [19], [22], [24] ORMEX [25], [26], [27]).…”