La estrategia político-militar de la administración de Donald Trump

Krivolapov, Oleg; Stepanova, Nataliya

doi:10.37656/s20768400-2020-4-02

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evan Ellis (2019), a professor in the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College, points to a connection between U.S. national interests and strategic formulations and argues that cooperation in matters of security is one of the ways in which U.S. leadership is reinforced. According to Krivolápov and Stepánova (2020), the political/military strategy for Latin America of the Trump administration saw the region from a perspective of strategic competition (even though this did not lead to an increase in the amount of U.S. resources being sent to the region), 2 and this perspective can be seen in the speeches given by Southcom military officials. Commander Craig Faller (U.S. Southcom, 2020a:1), for example, called the Western Hemisphere "our shared neighborhood.…”

Section: Transformations In Latin American Geopolitics and The Us Rea...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various U.S. governments have seen Chinese economic growth as a regional and global challenge to U.S. hegemony, especially in Latin America (Nolte, 2013). This negative perception of Chinese influence intensified during the Trump administration (Ayerbe, 2019;Campos and Prevost, 2019;Krivolápov Lívia Peres Milani has a doctorate in international relations from the San Tiago Dantas Interinstitutional Graduate Program in International Relations of the Universidade Estadual Paulista, the Universidade Nacional de Campinas, and the Pontificia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Currently she is pursuing postdoctoral research at the Universidade Estadual Paulista funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

U.S. Hegemony in Latin America during an Age of Challenges: The Perception of Threats by the U.S Southern Command

Milani¹

2022

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U.S. hegemony in Latin America is being challenged by the economic presence of foreign powers, such as China, in the region. Much of the literature that discusses this phenomenon deals with the economic and political dimensions of Chinese expansion and the U.S. reaction. Another aspect of this phenomenon is the effects of these changes on the way threats are perceived by U.S. military personnel operating in Latin America. An analysis of declassified documents produced by U.S. Southern Command during the Trump and Biden administrations identifies the threats and challenges perceived by military officials during these two administrations. A hegemonia estadunidense na América Latina vem sendo contestada em razão dos desafios representados pela presença econômica de potências estrangeiras, como a China, na região. Grande parte da literatura que discute este fenômeno tem analisado as dimensões econômicas e políticas da expansão chinesa e as reações estadounidenses. Outro aspecto desse fenômeno são os efeitos destas mudanças na maneira como as ameaças são percibidas pelos militares estadunidenses que operam na América Latina. uma análise dos documentos desclassificados produzidos pelo U.S Southern Command (Comando Sul) durante os governos Trump e Biden, identificando os desafios e ameaças que foram percebidos pelos militares durante estes dois governos.

show abstract

Section: Transformations In Latin American Geopolitics and The Us Rea...mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

U.S. Hegemony in Latin America during an Age of Challenges: The Perception of Threats by the U.S Southern Command

Milani¹

2022

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

US “Outposts” in Latin America: Military-Technical Cooperation, Military Bases and Joint Exercises

Piatakov,

Kodzoev

2023

Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Meždunar. otnoš.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors analyze the forms of interaction between the United States and Latin America in the military sphere. The relevance of studying this issue is due to the aggravation of relations between the collective West and Russia, as well as between the United States and China, within the framework of which Latin America acts as a zone of competition between the world powers. In this regard, the analysis of Latin American vector of US policy in the military aspect from the point of view of Russia’s strategic interests is particularly important. The lack of domestic scientific research on this problem greatly adds to its relevance. As for the novelty, based on the review of the world market of arms and military equipment (AME), this article determines the dynamics and the share of the American producer in the total volume of arms trade. In the context of military-technical cooperation (MTC), the authors also consider the peculiarities of the American military power projection on Latin America, which is a zone of exclusive interests of the United States. Among the key formats of interaction and projection of influence, the authors include the following: arms and military-technical supplies to the armies and security services of the states of the region; training of military personnel in Latin American countries; financing of armies and military units; cooperation programs to optimize the managerial and organizational functions of the Latin American armed forces, establishment and maintenance of various types of military bases, conducting joint military exercises. Using new factual material, we examine each of the listed forms and show the systematic and geostrategic nature of the US influence on the Latin American region in the military aspect. As for military trade, the authors identify the main partners of the United States in South America.

show abstract

El populismo anti-China de Donald Trump durante 2020: análisis desde la teoría de Laclau y Mouffe

Mejía-Rivadeneira

2022

Tejedora

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo analiza la política anti-China de Trump durante 2020, año marcado por la crisis multidimensional provocada por la covid-19 y por las elecciones presidenciales donde se impuso Biden. Concretamente, se busca entender en qué medida el mandatario republicano hizo de China el contrario de un discurso antagonista emocionante, considerando la teoría sobre populismo de Laclau y Mouffe y los datos empíricos recogidos para cumplir con tal propósito. Así, el texto plantea que Trump antagonizó estratégicamente con grupos de diferente índole de acuerdo a la coyuntura política, y China fue un oponente clave en el 2020, ya que hay una rivalidad cada vez más clara entre ambas naciones y viejos prejuicios racistas en EE UU. De este modo, Trump quiso activar y mantener el respaldo de los sectores conservadores de la sociedad, principalmente de los adultos blancos que viven en las ciudades relativamente pequeñas, su voto duro. Adicionalmente, el conflicto comercial y verbal del año 2020 fortaleció en cierto grado al mandatario chino, Xi Jinping, al avivar el patriotismo en los sectores politizados de su país, en una suerte de efecto rally 'round the flag. Palabras Clave: populismo, antagonismo, frontera política, discurso, Donald Trump y China.

show abstract

La estrategia político-militar de la administración de Donald Trump

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

U.S. Hegemony in Latin America during an Age of Challenges: The Perception of Threats by the U.S Southern Command

U.S. Hegemony in Latin America during an Age of Challenges: The Perception of Threats by the U.S Southern Command

US “Outposts” in Latin America: Military-Technical Cooperation, Military Bases and Joint Exercises

El populismo anti-China de Donald Trump durante 2020: análisis desde la teoría de Laclau y Mouffe

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About