2015
DOI: 10.3917/grh.151.0073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La prise en compte des fautes d’orthographe dans les dossiers de candidature par les recruteurs : une étude empirique par la méthode des protocoles verbaux

Abstract: La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employers from other countries might have different attitudes and behaviors when they are judging spelling errors in a recruitment process. A recent study (Martin-Lacroux, 2015) concluded that French recruiters make specific attributions (e.g., lack of politeness, dyslexia, or lack of respect) when they are facing spelling errors. These attributions are not the same as those made by participants in previous studies conducted in the United States (e.g., lack of professionalism, lower intellectual ability; see Carr & Stefaniak, 2012; Kreiner et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employers from other countries might have different attitudes and behaviors when they are judging spelling errors in a recruitment process. A recent study (Martin-Lacroux, 2015) concluded that French recruiters make specific attributions (e.g., lack of politeness, dyslexia, or lack of respect) when they are facing spelling errors. These attributions are not the same as those made by participants in previous studies conducted in the United States (e.g., lack of professionalism, lower intellectual ability; see Carr & Stefaniak, 2012; Kreiner et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%