La production scientifique issue de la formation initiale à la faculté de médecine d’Angers entre 2002 et 2008 : de bonne qualité mais insuffisante

Baufreton, Christophe; Chrétien, Jean-Marie; Moreau-Cordier, Florence; Moreau, F.; Portefaix, Hadrien; Branchereau, Héloïse; Huez, Jean-François; Richard, Isabelle; Saint‐André, Jean‐Paul

doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2011.11.026

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The percentage of derivative articles published by students during the doctoral studies and postdoctoral period in our study was 20.1%. This data is comparable to a survey by Pitche et al (2007) among faculties, where "theses represented only 21.6% of these publications" [articles in indexed journals] and Baufreton et al (2012) that conducted searches in databases with surveys of validation among theses supervisors and found that 165 theses from the School of Medicine of Angers, France, produced 28% of publications, out of 97 (16%) indexed in PubMed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 75%

Medical theses and derivative articles: dissemination of contents and publication patterns

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Doctoral theses are an important source of publication in universities, although little research has been carried out on the publications resulting from theses, on so-called derivative articles. This study investigates how derivative articles can be identified through a text analysis based on the full-text of a set of medical theses and the full-text of articles, with which they shared authorship. The text similarity analysis methodology applied consisted in exploiting the full-text articles according to organization of scientific discourse IMRaD (Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion) using the TurnItIn plagiarism tool. The study found that the text similarity rate in the Discussion section can be used to discriminate derivative articles from non-derivative articles. Additional findings were: the first position of the thesis's author dominated in 85 % of derivative articles, the participation of supervisors as coauthors occurred in 100 % of derivative articles, the authorship credit retained by the thesis's author was 42 % in derivative articles, the number of coauthors by article was 5 in derivative articles versus 6.4 coauthors, as average, in nonderivative articles and the time differential regarding the year of thesis completion showed that 87.5 % of derivative articles were published before or in the same year of thesis completion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 75%

Medical theses and derivative articles: dissemination of contents and publication patterns

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specifically, lack of writing experience was found in a previous study, suggesting that PhD students with a medical background did not receive sufficient training in writing as part of their curriculum [20,21], although possible solutions were not evaluated. In contrast to this study, other studies among hospital trainees, surgeons and researchers have identified further barriers to writing: mainly limited time, but also limited data, remote working, lack of logistical resources, cognitive burden, and perceiving plagiarism as a threat [8][9][10]20,22]. This difference might be explained by a difference in the participants' circumstances, as the PhD students in this study had a structured program with a clear and approved timeline as part of their study plan.…”

Section: Barrierscontrasting

confidence: 58%

Facilitators and Barriers for Young Medical Doctors Writing Their First Manuscript for Publication

Raffing

Jensen

Larsen

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although scientific publication is often mandatory in medical professions, writing the first research article for publication is challenging, especially as medical curricula have only a minor focus on scientific writing. The aim was therefore to identify facilitators and barriers experienced by medical doctors writing their first scientific article for publication. An explorative inductive approach made use of semi-structured interviews for collecting data until saturation. Data were analyzed with systematic text condensation. Several barriers were identified: (a) writing in general; (b) writing in English; (c) dealing with content, structure, and presentation; and (d) navigating in the author group. Good supervision in the initial writing phase was a facilitating factor. Medical doctors requested a course in which they could work on their own articles and give feedback to fellow students. They valued skilled lecturers and individual supervision, and they wanted to learn about author instructions, how to present text correctly, and how to sell their core message. Their goal was to create a useful end product and to obtain European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) points. The facilitators and barriers that medical doctors experience when writing their first scientific article for publication and their course requests should be reflected in the learning objectives and content of future courses.

show abstract

“…En plus des informations sur le nombre d'articles (et leur répartition A, B, C, D, E), les données SIGAPS ont permis de repérer des établissements surspécialisés sur la MA, d'analyser les domaines sur lesquels portaient les publications, mais aussi d'identifier les recherches associées et les collaborations.Ce travail repose sur SIGAPS, conçu pour analyser l'activité de recherche du CHU de Lille, et utilisé depuis pour la répartition nationale des crédits MERRI. Il illustre l'utilisation plus stratégique que financière qui peut être faite de SIGAPS, ce qui renforce la nécessité d'en connaître les limites méthodologiques.Bien que SIGAPS soit jugé robuste[20], peu de travaux d'évaluation scientifique ont été réalisés à partir de ses données[21][22][23][24][25]. L'interrogation nominative de PubMed, et non sur les adresses peu fiables (2700 variantes identifiées pour le CHU de Lille entre 1990 et 2014), et la validation des publications par les chercheurs eux-mêmes, sont les deux piliers méthodologiques qui assurent la fiabilité des données SIGAPS d'un chercheur, d'un établissement ou d'une inter région.…”

unclassified

Utilisation des données SIGAPS pour mesurer l’impact du plan Alzheimer sur la production d’articles des CHU

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number and "quality" of original articles on AD production by the CHU increased after the AP starting of AP initiation in 2008. Whether or not this was directly due to the financial support provided by the AP remains to be determined. The scientific production on AD was unequally distributed throughout the country, the CHU being already strongly involved in AD research before the AP reinforced their commitment after. This work illustrates the potential implication of SIGAPS as a strategic tool for research policy.

show abstract

La production scientifique issue de la formation initiale à la faculté de médecine d’Angers entre 2002 et 2008 : de bonne qualité mais insuffisante

Cited by 9 publications

References 13 publications

Medical theses and derivative articles: dissemination of contents and publication patterns

Medical theses and derivative articles: dissemination of contents and publication patterns

Facilitators and Barriers for Young Medical Doctors Writing Their First Manuscript for Publication

Utilisation des données SIGAPS pour mesurer l’impact du plan Alzheimer sur la production d’articles des CHU

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About