DOI: 10.20868/upm.thesis.66546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

La protección del patrimonio arquitectónico en los países europeos del diálogo 5+5. Análisis y comparación de la legislación y estudio de la viabilidad de la armonización de las categorías en las que se clasifica el patrimonio arquitectónico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this declaration entails the obligation to draft a Special Protection Plan or other planning mechanism features in urbanistic legislation, the degree of compliance with this is variable and depends directly on the resources available to individual town councils [71]. The diversity of criteria, categories, interpretations and definitions found in the different regional legislations linked to heritage, the lack of definition of municipal norms and the absence of protection bodies in a large proportion of vernacular buildings [72,73] have also brought about the abandonment of numerous buildings and the proliferation of a wide range of interventions that do not always favour the conservation of this type of heritage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this declaration entails the obligation to draft a Special Protection Plan or other planning mechanism features in urbanistic legislation, the degree of compliance with this is variable and depends directly on the resources available to individual town councils [71]. The diversity of criteria, categories, interpretations and definitions found in the different regional legislations linked to heritage, the lack of definition of municipal norms and the absence of protection bodies in a large proportion of vernacular buildings [72,73] have also brought about the abandonment of numerous buildings and the proliferation of a wide range of interventions that do not always favour the conservation of this type of heritage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael Petzet signals that these criteria are strongly related to the historical (intending age and commemorative) and artistic values, but that they don't have to be limited to them, mentioning other values like scientific, ethnological, or anthropological. 58 Descending to a smaller scale, at the national and regional level, it can be noted that in a sample of European countries (those in the 5+5 Dialogue: France, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain) 59 the criteria for listing reflected in the different laws refer to having cultural importance or interest (in Spanish it is also used the term valor as a synonym of importance in the national and regional legislation regarding cultural heritage listing), defining it with concepts as historical, artistic, ethnographic, scientific, archaeological, geological, industrial, social, anthropological, or aesthetic importance, to name some of them. 60 Depending on how recent the law is, the kinds of importance may increase, adapting to the ever-increasing kinds and levels of heritage being appreciated or acknowledged.…”
Section: The Use Of Value Typologies In Heritage Listingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respective area of San Sebastián is marked by diverse architectural styles. Most of the buildings with cultural value prior to 1945 have been protected, though not the later buildings, with some exceptions [13]. The value of these buildings does not only lie in their architectural uniqueness but also in the specific and recognizable urban image they generate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%