2007 4th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2007.4392367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lab and Research Activities at Wireless Trondheim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The easy answer to RQ-1 is 'Yes'. 55% of the participants said they probably would use this kind of system if it was available in the city environment (through Wireless Trondheim [3]). Jane admitted that she probably would use this kind of application.…”
Section: Case Study -Findmyfriendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The easy answer to RQ-1 is 'Yes'. 55% of the participants said they probably would use this kind of system if it was available in the city environment (through Wireless Trondheim [3]). Jane admitted that she probably would use this kind of application.…”
Section: Case Study -Findmyfriendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible adaptation of BPMN to address such issues easier would be promising. As part of our ongoing work with mobile technology and services and lately IoT-solutions in Wireless Trondheim [13] we are currently working with such extensions. Frequently direct access to reliable data sources is not possible, requiring municipalities to find workarounds that are often expensive, time-consuming, and often of dubious quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is part of over long-term effort on research and development of mobile services and applications in the Wireless Trondheim Living Lab [38], combining innovation methods with research results [39]. For future research, it can be interesting to combine manual maintenance of the personal profile with automatic evolution and adaption of profile information (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%