2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0090-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lab-on-a-Chip PCR-RFLP Assay for the Detection of Canine DNA in Burger Formulations

Abstract: Canine species detection in foods is important in the perspectives of health, religions, and fare-trade food business. This study describes a very short-amplicon length Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) assay with lab-on-a-chip detection platform for the authentication of canine DNA in processed foods. A 100-bp fragment of canine mitochondrial Cytochrome b (cytb) gene was selected and amplified using a pair of canine-specific primers. The amplified PCR products wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] has carried out PCR-RFLP to discriminate C. porosus, C. palustris and C. gangeticus in fresh blood samples, nonetheless, the assay was not tested under food processing conditions. Previously, successful PCR-RFLP assay has been carried out in various food products, namely frankfurter, [27,42] meatballs, [34] burgers [29,41,43] for the detection of rabbit, rat, squirrel, beef, buffalo, pig, cat, dog, and monkey.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] has carried out PCR-RFLP to discriminate C. porosus, C. palustris and C. gangeticus in fresh blood samples, nonetheless, the assay was not tested under food processing conditions. Previously, successful PCR-RFLP assay has been carried out in various food products, namely frankfurter, [27,42] meatballs, [34] burgers [29,41,43] for the detection of rabbit, rat, squirrel, beef, buffalo, pig, cat, dog, and monkey.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feline PCR product was amplified from all contaminated meatballs, showing the tested LOD of the assay was 0.01% (w/w) feline meat. Previously, Ali et al (2013) and Rahman et al (2015) detected 0.1% (w/w) and 0.01% (w/w) canine DNA in frankfurters and burgers formulations, respectively. However, we do not think there is a need for adulteration detection below 0.01% since adulteration at this level is not profitable and unlikely to be done.…”
Section: Sensitivity In Admixed and Meatballsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 14.2 summarizes the most relevant information from reported PCR-RFLP methods, from which it can be inferred that mtDNA markers are mostly targeted to differentiate domestic and game meat species. Most PCR-RFLP methods use gel More recently, chip-based capillary electrophoresis has emerged as an alternative to conventional electrophoresis for RFLP analysis for meat authentication, producing higher resolution band patterns, shorter analysis times, higher versatility, reproducibility, and suitability for automation (Ali et al, 2012a(Ali et al, , 2015aFajardo et al, 2009a;Rahman et al, 2015). …”
Section: Dna-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%