1979
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(79)90443-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LaB6 and SmB6 (001) surfaces studied by angle-resolved XPS, LEED and ISS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of the surfaces (we estimate more than 90% of the surface areas investigated so far) exhibited much more complex topographies, as exemplified in otherwise flat B terraces; we refer to these as chain-like disordered reconstructions, in contrast to the ð2 × 1Þ ordered one. Both reconstructions are in good agreement with the proposal of a partly occupied Sm surface layer (38) and clearly attest the simplest solution to avoid the polarization catastrophe associated with polar surface termination planes (39). The presence of Sm and B 6 octahedra in equal amounts and their mixing on short length scales prevents the buildup of long-range electric fields from charged surface areas.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, many of the surfaces (we estimate more than 90% of the surface areas investigated so far) exhibited much more complex topographies, as exemplified in otherwise flat B terraces; we refer to these as chain-like disordered reconstructions, in contrast to the ð2 × 1Þ ordered one. Both reconstructions are in good agreement with the proposal of a partly occupied Sm surface layer (38) and clearly attest the simplest solution to avoid the polarization catastrophe associated with polar surface termination planes (39). The presence of Sm and B 6 octahedra in equal amounts and their mixing on short length scales prevents the buildup of long-range electric fields from charged surface areas.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They found that whereas the (100) and (111) surfaces yield (1 × 1) patterns, indicating that no reconstruction occurs, the (110) surface shows additional spots due to reconstruction. Subsequent studies have also shown LEED patterns of (100) [32][33][34][35][36] and (111) [36] surfaces of LaB 6 confirming the results of Oshima et al [25]. For the LaB 6 (110) surface, the reconstruction was confirmed by Bas et al [37] and Nishitani et al [36] who observed a c(2 × 2) pattern at room temperature, which changed into a (1 × 1) pattern at 860…”
Section: Hexaboride Surface Structuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A plot of the metal-to-boron peak-height ratio was well fit with a calculated ratio based on a La-terminated surface model. A similar approach was applied to the SmB 6 (100) surface, where the XPS data implied that the surface was only partly metal terminated [33]. Support for this interpretation of the XPS data for SmB 6 (100) was provided by ion scattering spectroscopy (ISS) data.…”
Section: Hexaboride Surface Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2×1 surface reconstruction has been indeed observed on SmB 6 (001). This reconstruction has been found on UHV (ultra high vacuum) annealed samples by LEED [68,69] and on UHV cleaved samples by STM topographic imaging [19,20] and also in one ARPES study [57]. However, for UHV cleaved samples, neither LEED [24,25] nor the vast majority of ARPES studies [22][23][24][25][26] have found signs of a 2×1 reconstruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%