2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free determination of prostate specific membrane antigen in human whole blood at nanomolar levels by magnetically assisted surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several SERS platforms have been reported for early-stage prostate cancer diagnosis. Some of the more researched morphologies include MNP-AuNP (Figure 11a) [233] and MNP-AgNP assemblies [234]. SERS-based genetic assays have been reported to be four orders of magnitude more sensitive than polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays [235].…”
Section: Sers Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several SERS platforms have been reported for early-stage prostate cancer diagnosis. Some of the more researched morphologies include MNP-AuNP (Figure 11a) [233] and MNP-AgNP assemblies [234]. SERS-based genetic assays have been reported to be four orders of magnitude more sensitive than polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays [235].…”
Section: Sers Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostate cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer disease and it causes death to almost 12% of all cancer cases. [ 1,2 ] For early diagnosis of prostate cancer, measurement of the blood concentration of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal exam are the usually utilized prostate cancer diagnosis methods. [ 2,3 ] Nevertheless, the main obstruction of PSA analysis is its low specificity that causes a high negative biopsy rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1,2 ] For early diagnosis of prostate cancer, measurement of the blood concentration of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal exam are the usually utilized prostate cancer diagnosis methods. [ 2,3 ] Nevertheless, the main obstruction of PSA analysis is its low specificity that causes a high negative biopsy rate. Furthermore, PSA is not a specific marker of prostate cancer because with some conditions such as benign prostatic hyperplasia and non‐specific inflammation the PSA level is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until now, several analytical techniques have been developed for determination of PSA and Myo individually. These include chromatography [8,9], mass spectroscopy [10,11], fluorescence spectroscopy [12,13], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [14,15], white light reflectance spectroscopy [16,17], capillary electrophoresis [18], chemiluminescence [19], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [20,21], electrochemiluminescence [22,23], radioimmunoassay [24,25], time-resolved immunofluorometric assay [26], surface plasmon fluorescence immunoassay [27], bioluminescent immunoassay [28], electrochemical [29], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [24,30] and microcantilever method [31]. Of these methods, biosensors especially electrochemical types can offer some advantages in contrast to the commonly used sensing tools, including simultaneous analysis of biomarkers, capability of miniaturization, lower cost and simplicity of analysis [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%