2013
DOI: 10.1038/srep02624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-Free Nanometer-Resolution Imaging of Biological Architectures through Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering

Abstract: Label free imaging of the chemical environment of biological specimens would readily bridge the supramolecular and the cellular scales, if a chemical fingerprint technique such as Raman scattering can be coupled with super resolution imaging. We demonstrate the possibility of label-free super-resolution Raman imaging, by applying stochastic reconstruction to temporal fluctuations of the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) signal which originate from biomolecular layers on large-area plasmonic surfaces wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2 c, the intensities at 1013 ± 3, 1200 ± 3, and 1636 ± 3 cm −1 peaks were measured and normalized with the mean value. According to the statistical analysis, the standard deviation, σ , for all diffraction-limit pixels in the 20 µm × 20 µm area is 21.6%-22.7%, which is reasonably good compared with other random particle based SERS substrates [ 25,26 ] or hierarchical porous structures. [ 18,53 ] Although excellent variation smaller than 10% have been obtained using top-down nanofabrication methods, [54][55][56] the large area low cost fabrication and ultrabroadband response is the advantage of the proposed metasurface substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 2 c, the intensities at 1013 ± 3, 1200 ± 3, and 1636 ± 3 cm −1 peaks were measured and normalized with the mean value. According to the statistical analysis, the standard deviation, σ , for all diffraction-limit pixels in the 20 µm × 20 µm area is 21.6%-22.7%, which is reasonably good compared with other random particle based SERS substrates [ 25,26 ] or hierarchical porous structures. [ 18,53 ] Although excellent variation smaller than 10% have been obtained using top-down nanofabrication methods, [54][55][56] the large area low cost fabrication and ultrabroadband response is the advantage of the proposed metasurface substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[ 25,26,33 ] The nominal mass thickness of the directly deposited fi lm is 9.1 nm. The sample was thermally annealed at 120 °C under the nitrogen ambient (see the Experimental Section for more fabrication details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thin Ag layer of 3 nm mass thickness is evaporated on the HfO 2 , which forms Ag nanoislands of average diameter of 30 nm and thickness of 10 nm. 21,22 The surface exhibits a broad plasmonic absorption band around 580 nm (Figure 3(b)) and a repeatable photoresponse as measured by XPS, as shown in Figures 3(c) and 3(d). When a semicontinuous film is formed on top of HfO 2 by depositing 5 nm thick Ag, no photoresponse can be observed (Figures 3(e)-3(h)).…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The sensitivity can be improved greatly by combining SNOM with other techniques such as coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS), stimulated Raman scattering [25], or tip enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) [26]. More recently surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has demonstrated label-free single molecule resolution [18,27]. Coupling Raman spectroscopy with c-SNOM systems overcomes the limitations of the other sensitivity enhancing techniques and can achieve nanoscale-SNOM enhanced Raman spectroscopy [17].…”
Section: C-snom Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%