2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40100-019-0123-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?

Abstract: We examine the impact of food labels that make unsupported claims of food safety and labels that provide information to support such claims on consumer choices and examine consumers' willingness to pay for beef products with these different food safety labeling cues. Empirical results from a survey of grocery shoppers in a Midwestern city in the USA show that more than two thirds of respondents who received a label with unsubstantiated food safety claims chose this option and were willing to pay the highest pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly crucial, as the content of the message and the way it is presented to consumers can affect the purchase intention and WTP. In this respect, a recent study on the labelling of food safety attributes highlighted that food labels characterized by unsubstantiated claims could determine higher premiums, compared to labels that offer factual information [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly crucial, as the content of the message and the way it is presented to consumers can affect the purchase intention and WTP. In this respect, a recent study on the labelling of food safety attributes highlighted that food labels characterized by unsubstantiated claims could determine higher premiums, compared to labels that offer factual information [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, stakeholders in the Irish beef industry might need to explore new markets for beef exports, whilst beef premiums and the current beef grading system should be adjusted according to additional production and trade costs induced by Brexit. Previous empirical studies have shown that consumers are willing to pay for specific food safety standards and environmental meat attributes (e.g., Britwum & Yiannaka, 2019; Lewis et al, 2017; White & Brady, 2014). However, meat quality is a complex concept with coarse grading systems often failing to measure significant quality aspects for consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, food safety attributes serve as an indispensable role for consumers to determine which products to be purchased [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Consequently, food safety labeling and meat safety attributes have the potential to influence consumer purchase intentions in grocery stores because they could assist consumers in ensuring as well as guaranteeing food safety [ 10 , 11 ]. However, the investigations regarding meat safety attributes in traditional markets have not been widely observed [ 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%