1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00673-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial

Abstract: Intravaginal misoprostol and the dinoprostone vaginal insert appear to be safe agents for cervical ripening and labor induction. However, misoprostol is less expensive and more effective than the dinoprostone vaginal insert.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
37
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The standardized cervical priming and induction of labor are predominantly achieved by means of PG administration. However, in the recent years, there has been a considerable interest in the use of misoprostol [3][4][5] and NO donors [6,7] for cervical ripening and labor induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardized cervical priming and induction of labor are predominantly achieved by means of PG administration. However, in the recent years, there has been a considerable interest in the use of misoprostol [3][4][5] and NO donors [6,7] for cervical ripening and labor induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Nearly 50.86% of cases were beyond 41weeks of gestation & 47.42% were term pregnancies (between 37-40 weeks of gestation) as shown in Table 1. Literature shows that prolonged pregnancy (40%) is the commonest indication, next common is PIH (13%) and the third common is PROM (4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Sanches-Ramos L et al, too found higher CS rate in Misoprostol group (22.2% versus 13%). [14] Regarding induction-delivery interval, Sahu L et al and Fernandez E et al found it to be shorter in Misoprostol group. [15,16] Similar result was seen from our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%