2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor market policy evaluation in equilibrium: Some lessons of the job search and matching model

Abstract: Abstract:We analyze the consequences of counseling provided to job seekers in a standard job search and matching model. It turns out that neglecting equilibrium effects induced by counseling can lead to wrong conclusions. In particular, counseling can increase steady state unemployment although counseled job seekers exit unemployment at a higher rate than the noncounseled. Dynamic analysis shows that permanent and transitory policies can have effects of opposite sign on unemployment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the empirical evaluation in which outcomes of participants and nonparticipants are compared are then only relevant at the observed treatment intensity. Cahuc and Le Barbanchon (2010) show within a theoretical equilibrium search model that neglecting equilibrium effects can lead to wrong conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the program. Albrecht et al (2009), Blundell et al (2004) and Ferracci et al (2010) show empirically that spillover effects of various labor market policies can be quite sizable and Lise et al (2004) find that the conclusion from a cost-benefit evaluation is reversed when taking account of equilibrium effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results from the empirical evaluation in which outcomes of participants and nonparticipants are compared are then only relevant at the observed treatment intensity. Cahuc and Le Barbanchon (2010) show within a theoretical equilibrium search model that neglecting equilibrium effects can lead to wrong conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the program. Albrecht et al (2009), Blundell et al (2004) and Ferracci et al (2010) show empirically that spillover effects of various labor market policies can be quite sizable and Lise et al (2004) find that the conclusion from a cost-benefit evaluation is reversed when taking account of equilibrium effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the rare papers that have used search models to evaluate labor market policy in Europe is Cahuc and Le Barbanchon (2010). The authors calibrated the model to the French economy and examined the impact of counseling policies on the unemployment rate both in equilibrium and during the transitory period.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated by Zehner (2002), search frictions are no implausible assumption when regarding the market for coffee beans. In order to account for the fact that producers are heterogeneous in that they are either associated with an FT organisation or not, we use the extension of the basic search model introduced by Cahuc and LeBarbanchon (2008) with slight adaptations to the FT framework. 3 More precisely, we assume the following set-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In our framework, we replicate that FT labelled products sell at a higher price and producers' bargaining power is larger if associated with an FT organisation. In contrast, Cahuc and LeBarbanchon (2008), who observe a labour market equilibrium, account for a different job arrival rate for two separate groups of unemployed people, either benefiting or not from counselling services. charges generally driving the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%