2011
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20144472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratorial Prototype for Detection of Defects on Geomembranes - The Geophysical Approach

Abstract: Although there are some test methods do detect and locate defects in geomembrane liners after the placement of the primary leachate collection system, namely the soil-covered geomembrane method (mobile probe) and the grid method (permanent), the existing methods present some disadvantages. They are labor and time consuming and, so, very expensive. These conditions lead us to the development of a quick and low-cost, but also accurate, test prototype to check the geomembranes integrity after the placement of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, validation tests of each prototype were performed under controlled conditions (in laboratory). Figure 4 illustrates the results obtained with the final mesh of electrodes both at the laboratory, in a confined space (1.8 × 1.8 m (Mota et al 2011)), where the electrical output of the source was limited to 60 V and the GM defect was a 4 cm cut, and at the large scale pilot plant (8.5 × 8.5 m) built at LNEC's campus with a 2 mm hole diameter and an output source of 200 V. The higher values of the electrical potential field at laboratory when compared to those obtained at LNEC's pilot plant is a result of the combined effect of the confined pilot plant at the laboratory and the dimension of the cut. With a hole of 2 mm at the laboratory the maximum absolute values were around 4 mV with the same output voltage and without the covering sand layer (Mota et al 2011).…”
Section: Tests Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned, validation tests of each prototype were performed under controlled conditions (in laboratory). Figure 4 illustrates the results obtained with the final mesh of electrodes both at the laboratory, in a confined space (1.8 × 1.8 m (Mota et al 2011)), where the electrical output of the source was limited to 60 V and the GM defect was a 4 cm cut, and at the large scale pilot plant (8.5 × 8.5 m) built at LNEC's campus with a 2 mm hole diameter and an output source of 200 V. The higher values of the electrical potential field at laboratory when compared to those obtained at LNEC's pilot plant is a result of the combined effect of the confined pilot plant at the laboratory and the dimension of the cut. With a hole of 2 mm at the laboratory the maximum absolute values were around 4 mV with the same output voltage and without the covering sand layer (Mota et al 2011).…”
Section: Tests Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equipment was developed based on the manual mobile reading dipole described in ASTM D7007. In the first phase of the equipment development, several prototypes were built (Figure 1), which consisted primarily of bars where the electrical potential reading electrodes were installed with fixed distances (Mota et al 2011).…”
Section: Equipment Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landfills are engineering facilities, composed by one or more cells, designed and constructed with a barrier system (lining system) which objective is to assure the protection of the environment. This system includes active and passive barriers (Mota et al 2011). The active barrier includes, among other materials, a geomembrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%