2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory analysis of the habitat occupancy of the crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Gould) in an invaded ecosystem: The north-eastern Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One crab (average width of carapace was 1.3 cm corresponding to a typical length class of adult crabs in the study area) was added to each mesocom to achieve experimental densities (22 per m 2 ) corresponding to densities of crabs in infested areas (see result section). In the Gulf of Riga crabs are relatively stationary with estimated home range at 0.004 to 0.04 m 2 43 . This matches well with the spatial dimensions of mesocosms provided for crabs in the experiment (0.045 m 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One crab (average width of carapace was 1.3 cm corresponding to a typical length class of adult crabs in the study area) was added to each mesocom to achieve experimental densities (22 per m 2 ) corresponding to densities of crabs in infested areas (see result section). In the Gulf of Riga crabs are relatively stationary with estimated home range at 0.004 to 0.04 m 2 43 . This matches well with the spatial dimensions of mesocosms provided for crabs in the experiment (0.045 m 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that crabs live in oysters reefs (in native habitats), under stones, in various plant debris, in mud and sand with shell, and even among Fucus macroalgae on hard bottom [Ryan, 1956;Turoboyski, 1978;Petersen, 2006;Fowler et al, 2013]. In the experiment they preferred vegetated boulders compared to unvegetated boulders or sandy habitats [Nurkse et al, 2015]. This indicates a highly opportunistic habitat choice; however the presence of shelter appears to be a key factor [Petersen, 2006].…”
Section: Habitats and Hiding Habitmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the Baltic, they live on: various plant debris; mud and sand with shell; and among Fucus macroalgae on hard bottom (Turoboyski, 1973; Fowler et al , 2013), which has been its preferred habitat during the experiments performed by Nurkse et al . (2015). However, the presence of various kinds of shelters appears to be the key factor (Petersen, 2006; Zalota et al , 2016a), while the patterns of shelter use and hiding habits vary significantly between different sizes and sex groups and localities (Zalota et al , 2016a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%