2017
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2017.1411501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and Field Assessment of the Decagon 5TE and GS3 Sensors for Estimating Soil Water Content in Saline-Alkali Reclaimed Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been examined and confirmed by Son et al. (2017) in soils with different textures (e.g., silty clay). The pits were spaced 20 m apart.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been examined and confirmed by Son et al. (2017) in soils with different textures (e.g., silty clay). The pits were spaced 20 m apart.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The reason it was selected was that factory calibration for θ is accurate to ±0.03 m 3 m −3 in mineral soils when the bulk soil EC is <10 dS m −1 . This has been examined and confirmed by Son et al (2017) in soils with different textures (e.g., silty clay). The pits were spaced 20 m apart.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Sensors Installation and Soil Samples Collectionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is likely caused by the finer sampling interval of the FO-DTS at every 0.5 m against the very small scale (local) measurements used to represent the VWC at 10 m sampling interval with the GS3 layout. In addition, the GS3 probes are influenced by many factors, such as mineralogy, electric conductivity of the water, and contact between the soil and the probe (Son et al 2017). As the volume of measurement of this probe is small, large particles (and pores) near the probe could affect significantly the output.…”
Section: Assessment Of Active Fo-dts Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric soil moisture (θ) was evaluated at 167, 220, 240, and 286 DAS at a depth between 0-10 cm on nine plants per treatment recorded with a GS3 sensor (METER Group. Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) (Son et al, 2017). The soil water potential (Ψs) was calculated using Eq.…”
Section: Soil Water Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%