1993
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1993)119:3(453)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and Field Leaching Tests on Coastal Salt‐Bearing Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Y.-T. Kim and T.-H. Do Downloaded by [University of Tasmania] at 23:03 13 October 2014 Ismale (1993) also found that the preconsolidation pressure of natural and leached samples decreased from 50 kPa to 45 kPa, respectively. The decrease in preconsolidation pressure is caused by the weakness of the cementation bonds in the soil skeleton due to the reduced salt concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Y.-T. Kim and T.-H. Do Downloaded by [University of Tasmania] at 23:03 13 October 2014 Ismale (1993) also found that the preconsolidation pressure of natural and leached samples decreased from 50 kPa to 45 kPa, respectively. The decrease in preconsolidation pressure is caused by the weakness of the cementation bonds in the soil skeleton due to the reduced salt concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, a cement-treated sample at a lower salinity level displays slightly a higher shear strength compared to that of a cement-treated sample at the original salinity level. (Bjerrum,954) ........................................ Table 2-3 Comparison of soil physical properties before and after leaching (Ismael, 1993) ....... (Woo & Moh, 1977) Table 2-5 Factors affecting strength increase (Terashi, 1997) (Nataraj, et al, 1990) ............................... 9…”
Section: Author's Declaration For Electronic Submission Of a Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2-5 e-log p' curves of 1-D traditional consolidation tests (Liu, et al, 2017) .................... 10 Figure 2-6 Grain size distribution of samples before and after leaching (Ismael, 1993) .............. 12 Figure 2-7 Effect of leaching on soil sensitivity as measured from vane shear test (Woo & Moh, 1977) Figure 2-9 e log p plots for natural and leached samples (Ismael, 1993) (Torrace, 1974) ......... 16 Figure 2-13 Effective stress paths and envelopes of soils S35 (salinity level 35 g/L ) and S7 (salinity level 7 g/L) (Woo & Moh, 1977) (Bergado, et al, 1996) (Uddin, et al, 1997) . 25 (Uddin, et al, 1997) ........ 29…”
Section: Author's Declaration For Electronic Submission Of a Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From both the model and the test it could be concluded that leaching has nominal effect on u 0 . The source of cohesion intercept could be the cementation and/or particle interlocking (Ismael and Mollah 1998). Leaching may have caused the removal or weakening of mild cementation which in turn enhance the particles packing and interlocking under the applied confining or consolidation pressure and thus increasing the cohesion intercept.…”
Section: Shear Strength Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%